Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />the fact, it now seems clear that the S 1 site was contaminated sufficiently with selenium in <br />the food chain to result in elevated residues in larvae above those typically found in <br />uncontaminated reference sites. <br /> <br />One unusual laboratory study reported that larval bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) in the <br />control treatment contained selenium concentrations of 3.3 j.1g/g, but were fed a commercial diet <br />containing only 0.8 j.1g/g (Coyle et al. 1993). However, they also reported that the brine shrimp <br />nauplii they fed larvae from 5 days posthatch to 30 days posthatch contained selenium <br />concentrations of 2.7 j.1g/g. In their study, selenium concentrations in adult reproductive tissue <br />of control fish were 1.5-2 j.1g/g and in eggs was about 1.5 j.1g/g. Thus, larvae must have <br />accumulated selenium for the brine shrimp to reach a residue of 3.3 j.1g/g because the commercial <br />diet only contained 0.8j.1g/g. Coyle et al. (1993) reported that up to 5 days posthatch, larval <br />survival was >90%, but after 3 days of feeding brine shrimp. survival of control larvae decreased <br />dramatically and was less than 25%. These results match the reduced survival pattern in the <br />present study. ~vforeover, the selenium concentration in brine shrimp reported by Coyle et al. <br />(I993) was very similar to the selenium concentrations in zooplankton from S 1 in the present <br />study (2.3-3.5 ;.<g/g). However, Coyle et al. (1993) concluded that the high mortality of larvae in <br />their study was due to starvation resulting from unsuccessful transition between endogenous and <br />exogenous feeding. Nevertheless, the 3.3 j.1g/g selenium residue in control is substantially higher <br />than the typical range of selenium concentrations in control or reference fish (0.4-2.0 j.1g/g; Table <br />13). <br /> <br />Nauplii of brine shrimp have been used at the Yankton ERS in culturing larvae of <br />Colorado squawfish. razorback sucker, and bonytail for the past several years and survival has <br />been >90%. Other investigators have reported high survival of larval fish fed brine shrimp <br />nauplii when culturing yellow perch (Perca flavescens) (Hinshaw 1985) and bluegill (Smith <br />1976). Brine shrimp eggs purchased from Aquarium Products, Glen Burnie, MD, and used in <br />fish culture at Yankton ERS contained selenium concentrations of 1.83 j.1g/g wet weight <br />(analyzed at Yankton ERS in 1992). Selenium concentrations in nauplii were 3.0 j.1g/g dry <br />weight (assuming 88.4% moisture measured in brine shrimp nauplii as part of the analysis in <br />1996) in 1992.2.4 j.1g/g (assuming 88.4% moisture) in 1993. and 2.7 j.1g/g in 1996. These <br />concentrations of selenium in brine shrimp nauplii are similar to those of Coyle et al. (1993), <br />who reported 2.7 j.1g/g in nauplii from eggs purchased from Aquarium Products (personal <br />communication. Eugene Greer, NBS. Columbia, MO, 1996). In the present investigation. no <br />brine shrimp were used to culture larvae in studies 1,3, and 4, but were used to culture larvae in <br />study 2 for 4 days prior to the initiation of the study with 1 a-day old larvae. Consequently, it is <br />possible that some of the selenium in the larval razorback suckers in study 2 was accumulated <br />from brine shrimp nauplii. <br /> <br />Brine shrimp were the only food given to larval razorback suckers during the <br />supplemental feeding studies conducted for 20 days. Survival of larvae in the supplemental <br />feeding study was 90% or greater, thus indicating that food organisms containing selenium <br />concentrations of2.7 j.1g/g may not cause adverse effects in larval razorback suckers -- in the <br />absence of other physical, biological, or chemical stressors. Because high survival of larval fish <br /> <br />46 <br />