Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />organisms/L, 37 mg in ponds with 24 organisms/L. and 45 mg in ponds with 43 <br />organisms/L. Their results suggest that larvae in the present study and in the supplemental <br />feeding study did not grow as well as those in ponds where a greater variety of foods <br />including algae, sessile organisms, and detritus would be available. Other studies with larval <br />razorback sucker did not report weights (Papoulias and Minckley 1990, Marsh and Langhorst <br />1988, Langhorst and Marsh 1986). However, the length of larvae in the present study was <br />similar to that of larvae in the laboratory study of Papoulias and Minckley (1990), the <br />backwater site of Marsh and Langhorst (1988), and the supplement feeding study. <br /> <br />Survival of larvae in studies 1-4 was 0-27 %. Modde and Wick (1996) reported <br />survival of 1-2 year old razorback sucker in a 25-day cage study at Ouray NWR was 90- <br />100% at two wetland sites (Leota Bottom pond 7 and Sheppard Bottom pond 3), but <br />averaged 40% at three backwater sites on the Green River. They also reported 8-9% growth <br />in fish at the Sheppard wetland site and 2-3 % growth at the Leota site, but no or negative <br />growth in reference fish held at the Ouray Native Fish Facility and fish at the three <br />backwater sites. Survival of fish held at the wetland site in Old Charley Wash was 0-10% <br />due to a disease problem. The high survival of 1-2 year old fish at the two wetland sites <br />compared to our low survival rates with larval fish coincides with the generality that early <br />life stages of fish are more sensitive to environmental stresses than older fish (Rand and <br />Petrocelli 1985). No inorganic residues were measured in water, food organisms, or fish in <br />the study by Modde and Wick (1996). <br /> <br />Finger et al. (1995) conducted an on-site toxicity test at Ouray NWR (NR, SR, and <br />Leota Bottom pond 6) with 3-day old cladoceran (Daphnia ma!1:na), 3-day old fathead <br />minnow (Pimephales promelas), and 40-60 day old razorback sucker. The test involved only <br />waterborne exposure and no effects were observed in any of the exposures. The lack of <br />adverse effects was attributed to the relatively clean water used in the tests. Selenium <br />concentrations in water were 2-3 p.g/L in NR, 1-3 p.g/L in SR, and 0.1-0.8 p.g/L in Leota 6. <br />These concentrations in NR and SR seem abnormally low because Stephens et al. (1988, <br />1992) and Peltz and Waddell (1991) reported median selenium concentrations in outflow of <br />NR and SR were 40 p.g/L. Based on the low concentration of trace elements in water, the <br />advanced age of razorback sucker tested, and the water only route of exposure, it is not <br />surprising that no adverse effects were observed in their study. <br /> <br />Selenium <br /> <br />In the present study, S 1 was considered the reference site because it was believed to <br />be relatively uncontaminated, i.e., selenium concentrations in waterbird eggs were low <br />(Stephens et al. 1992, Peltz and Waddell 1991). However, selenium concentrations in larval <br />razorback sucker fed zooplankton from SI were extremely elevated in study 2 (14.3 p.g/g) <br />and near the lower end of the toxic threshold for adverse affects in larval fish (4 p.g/g; Lemly <br />1993) in study 3 (3.7 p.g/g). This lower value is almost two times the selenium <br />concentrations typically reported in control fish from laboratory studies with either water or <br />diet exposure or reference fish from field studies (0.4-2.0 p.g/g; Table 13). Although after <br /> <br />44 <br />