Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Supplemental feeding study <br /> <br />Survival at the end of the 20-day exposures was 95-97 % in the test with 5-day old <br />larvae, 90-95% in the test with lO-day old larvae, and 97-100% in the test with 24-day old <br />larvae (Table 12). There were no significant differences in survival between feeding groups <br />or between age groups. <br /> <br />For all age groups, fish length and weight were significantly different between feeding <br />groups (Table 12). Larvae fed 80 organisms/fish were significantly larger than larvae fed <br />either 20 or 40 organisms/fish, and larvae fed 40 organisms/fish were significantly larger <br />larvae fed 20 organisms/fish. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Survival and growth <br /> <br />Mortality in study 1 did not occur until day 5 of feeding selenium-laden zooplankton <br />when fish age was 10 days posthatch. This mortality was similar to study 2 where mortality <br />occurred earlier at day 2 of feeding when fish were 12 days posthatch. Mortality in studies 3 <br />and 4 occurred later than in studies 1 and 2 probably because of the advanced life stage (24- <br />28 day old) larvae at test initiation. In all four studies, about 50% mortality occurred <br />consistently after 10 to 15 days exposure in all treatments (study 1 10-15 days; study 2 6-12 <br />days; study 3 13-15 days; study 4 14-16 days) (Figures 4-7, Appendices 3-6). In contrast, <br />fish age when 50% mortality occurred was 15-20 days posthatch in study 1, 16-22 days in <br />study 2, 37-39 days in study 3, and 42-44 days in study 4. Mortality in this study occurred <br />sooner than reported by Papoulias and Minckley (1990) who found the median time to 50 % <br />mortality in starved larval razorback sucker was 24-25 days posthatch. They also reported <br />that larval razorback sucker first fed food beginning 7 days posthatch had 100 % survival and <br />those beginning 11 or 15 days posthatch had 90% survival after 50 days posthatch. <br />Starvation was probably not a cause of the reduced survival in the present study because <br />larvae were fed prior to and during the studies and mortality occurred in a shorter time <br />period than observed by Papoulias and Minckley (1990) for starved fish. <br /> <br />A concentration response between survival and selenium or other inorganic <br />concentrations in zooplankton was not observed in this study because a threshold for toxic <br />stress was apparently reached rapidly and exceeded in the larval razorback sucker, including <br />those in the reference treatment. Consequently, larvae in all treatments died at about the <br />same time. In study 1, the median time to death of larvae fed zooplankton from SR and NR <br />was significantly longer than for larvae fed zooplankton from S 1, which suggests an <br />antagonistic interaction between inorganics present in the food organisms. This reduced or <br />delayed stress in the SR and NR treatments, in turn, caused a significant delay in mortality <br />compared to the S 1 treatment. If a typical concentration response was present, larvae fed <br />zooplankton from SR and NR should have died first because inorganic concentrations were <br />highest in SR and NR. However. because mortality was significantly delayed in the SR and <br /> <br />40 <br />