Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />substantially (Tables 2 and 3). Conductivity was lowest at S 1 and generally three times <br />higher at SR and NR. Sites S3 and S4 were close to characteristics at Sl, whereas S5 was <br />similar to SR and NR. Chlorides and sulfates in particular showed wide variation between <br />sites, especially study 3 where chlorides were 12 to 13-fold higher and sulfates 4 to 5-fold <br />higher in SR and NR than in Sl (Table 2). <br /> <br />Inorganic residues <br /> <br />Selenium concentrations in water at the six sites also varied greatly (Table 4). <br />Reference water from Sl was consistently low in selenium concentration (< 1.1 J,tg/L) during <br />the four studies. Consequently, waterborne selenium in reference water used in all exposure <br />beakers probably did not contribute to adverse effects observed with larval razorback sucker. <br />Selenium concentrations in water from other sites were higher than the reference site. <br />Measured selenium concentrations were low at S3 and S4 (0.3 - 0.8 J,tg/L), slightly higher at <br />S5 (0.6 - 3.1 J,tg/L), and substantially higher at SR (14-21 J,tg/L) and NR (57-107 J,tg/L). <br /> <br />Selenium concentrations in zooplankton from the S 1 reference site were relatively low <br />and ranged from 2.3 to 3.5 /-Lg/g (Table 5). Concentrations were slightly higher in S3 and <br />S4 (2.4 - 6.7 J,tg/g), substantially elevated at S5 (12 - 26 J,tg/g), and extremely high at SR <br />and NR (44 - 96 J,tg/ g). Selenium concentrations decreased in zooplankton over time in sites <br />SI, S3, S4, and S5 probably due in large part to the flooding of these ponds with water from <br />the Green River. Waterborne concentrations of selenium at these sites were uniformly low <br />(Table 4) and did not change as much as selenium concentrations in zooplankton (Table 5). <br />Selenium concentrations in aquatic macroinvertebrates were elevated similar to those in <br />zooplankton (Table 6). Concentrations of selenium in macro invertebrates were lowest at <br />sites SI, S3, and S4, intermediate at S5, and highest at SR and NR. <br /> <br />Concentrations in water of only four elements out of 32 measured by ICAP showed a <br />pattern of elevation across sites similar to selenium (Table 7). Concentrations of boron, <br />lithium, sodium, and strontium were lowest in Sl, intermediate in S3, S4, and S5, and <br />highest in SR and NR, whereas 28 other elements had similar concentrations at the six sites. <br />The analytical limits of detection are usually high in ICAP analyses and the analysis is <br />typically conducted to detect relatively elevated concentrations of elements. The leAP <br />analysis showed selenium was elevated at SR and NR, but below detection at sites Sl, S3, <br />S4, and S5. <br /> <br />Concentrations in zooplankton of only two elements, strontium and zinc, out of 31 <br />measured by ICAP showed a pattern of elevation across sites similar to selenium (Table 8). <br />Several elements had higher concentrations in zooplankton from SI than other sites: arsenic <br />was 4 times higher than S4, cadmium 0.5-5 higher, copper 0.5-2 higher except for S4, nickel <br />2-7 higher, and lead 2-3 higher. Chromium was elevated in NR, vanadium in S3 and NR, <br />and zinc elevated in SR and NR. Selenium was detected in SR and NR, but not at other <br />sites, because of the relatively high limit of detection (9 J,tg/g). <br /> <br />18 <br />