Laserfiche WebLink
<br />compressed air from an oil-less air pump. Temperature in the mobile laboratory was <br />maintained as close to 200e as possible. The photoperiod was maintained at about 12 <br />light: 12 dark. <br /> <br />Live zooplankton were collected every other day either by plankton tow net or light <br />trap from six sites at Ouray NWR previously shown to have various amounts of selenium in <br />water and biota, i.e., North Roadside Pond and South Roadside Pond had high <br />concentrations, Sheppard Bottom pond 5 moderate concentrations, and Sheppard Bottom <br />ponds 1, 3, and 4 low concentrations (Stephens et al. 1988, 1992). The collection sites were <br />a beaver pond about 400 yards upstream from North Roadside Pond (NR), South Roadside <br />Pond (SR), Sheppard Bottom ponds 1 (SI, reference site), 3 (S3), 4 (S4), and 5 (S5) (Figure <br />3). All six sites were used in studies 1 and 2, whereas study 3 included S 1, NR, and SR, <br />and study 4 included S3, S4, and S5. Zooplankton were separated by size class using a <br />standard #40 stainless steel sieve. Plankton passing through the sieve were < 0.425 mm and <br />were used in the feeding studies. This size of zooplankton was selected because it is the size <br />equivalent of 24-hour-old nauplii of brine shrimp, which have been readily consumed by <br />larval razorback sucker in culture activities at the Yankton ERS. After sieving and prior to <br />counting and feeding, zooplankton were held in reference water. <br /> <br />Zooplankton from each site were concentrated by filtering water through the <br />collection bucket of a plankton tow net. Organisms were sampled with a 1-ml Hensen- <br />Stempel pipette and counted with a stereoscope microscope at 0.7x magnification and a <br />Wards zooplankton counting wheel. The number of organisms in three replicate counts were <br />averaged and the volume calculated to feed 20 or 40 organisms per fish for the number of <br />live fish in each exposure vessel. <br /> <br />Larval fish were fed 20 organisms per fish in study 1 for days 1 through 10 and in <br />study 2 for days 1 through 4. Thereafter, the feeding rate was 40 organisms per fish in <br />study 1 days 11-25, study 2 days 5-25, and studies 3 and 4 days 1-20. Based on 1600 ml <br />test water volume and 10 fish per test vessel, the 20 organisms per fish initial feeding rate <br />was equivalent to 125 organisms/L (200 organisms/1600 ml), and the 40 organisms per fish <br />initial feeding rate was 250 organisms/L. Fish were fed zooplankton once daily after water <br />renewal. <br /> <br />Reference water from S 1 used in renewals was collected daily and measured for water <br />quality characteristics (Table 1). Water temperature and dissolved oxygen concentrations <br />were measured daily in one replicate of each treatment in each study (Appendix 1). Mean <br />water temperature was I7.30C in study 1, 17.70C in study 2, I8.2oe in study 3, and I8.90C <br />in study 4. Mean dissolved oxygen concentrations were 7.6-7.8 mg/L in the studies. Water <br />quality characteristics were measured weekly in samples collected from the six sites where <br />zooplankton were collected (Table 2). Conductivity, pH, and salinity were measured weekly <br />in situ at the six sites where zooplankton were collected (Table 3, Appendix 2). Water <br />characteristics were measured using standard methods (APHA et al. 1989). <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />