My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8056
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:13:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8056
Author
Hamill, J.
Title
Restoring and Protecting Instream Flows for Endangered Fish in the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1992.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />some of the important life history events of the Colorado <br />squawfish, humpback chub, and razorback sucker (Figure 3) (Tyus <br />and Carp 1989). <br /> <br />The Service's flow recommendations for the endangered fish have <br />not been readily accepted by State agencies as technically <br />adequate for appropriating, acquiring, and/or legally protecting <br />the instream flow needs of the fish. One concern is that the <br />flow recommendations have been based on empirical data and <br />professional judgment rather than analytical habitat models. In <br />addition, the Colorado Water Conservation Board (Conservation <br />Board), which is responsible for review, approval, and subsequent <br />appropriation of instream flow water rights in Colorado, believes <br />the Service's recommendations and approach will not allow for a <br />determination of the "minimum" flow needed to recover the <br />species, or what the impact would be on the fish if flows less <br />than the recommended amounts were appropriated. In addition, <br />Reclamation and the Western Area Power Administration have <br />expressed concern that the Service's flow recommendations for the <br />Green River, especially for the spring and winter period, are not <br />biologically defensible and need further refinement. <br /> <br />Several actions have been taken through the Recovery Program to <br />resolve the disagreement over the Service flow recommendations <br />and methodologies. First, Dr. Jack Stanford, a noted aquatic <br />ecologist from the University of Montana, has been retained to: <br />(a) complete a comprehensive review of past and ongoing instream <br />flow activities, methods, and knowledge related to the <br />quantification of the instream flows needed for recovery of the <br />four endangered fish species in the upper Colorado River and <br />Green River subbasins; (b) identify technical and nontechnical <br />issues related to the instream flow activities and the Service's <br />instream flow recommendations; and (c) develop an action plan and <br />provide recommendations to resolve the technical issues related <br />to quantifying the instream flow needs of the endangered fish. <br />Dr. Stanford's review, which will be complete in July 1993, will <br />be overseen by the Instream Flow Subcommittee of the Recovery <br />Program. Second, an additional 5 years of research will be <br />conducted to refine and validate the winter and spring flow <br />recommendations for the Green River contained in the Service's <br />biological opinion on the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam. <br /> <br />Reoperation of Federal Reservoirs <br /> <br />The reoperation of Federal reservoirs to provide instream flows <br />for the endangered fish is an important element of the Recovery <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.