Laserfiche WebLink
<br />However, the high degree of environmental variability in the Green River <br />and sampling bias inherent in studying such a system no doubt affected <br />our ability to perceive similarities or differences in habitat <br />requirements, and this study did not evaluate microhabitat use. We were <br />further constrained in evaluating potential effects of the current <br />dominance of introduced fishes as a factor in the decline of the endemic <br />Colorado River fishes, because historic information on native fishes in <br />backwaters is virtually non-existent. We recommend more controlled <br />studies on habitat use and requirements of native fishes and their <br />potential interactions with introduced forms. <br /> <br />ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS <br />We thank numerous colleagues at the Vernal Field Office, Colorado <br />River Fishes Project, who collected field data 1979-1988 and assisted <br />with data entry and analysis. C. Karp provided helpful review comments <br />on an earlier draft of the manuscript. D. Moses prepared graphics and <br />provided technical support. The study was funded by the Bureau of <br />Reclamation and Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of Interior. <br /> <br />LITERATURE CITED <br />Behnke, R.J. and D.E. Benson. 1983. Endangered and threatened fishes of <br />the upper Colorado River basin. Cooperative Extension Service, <br />Colorado State University, Fort Collins. Bulletin 503A. 38 pp. <br />Black, T., and R.V. Bulkley. 1985a. Preferred temperatures of yearling <br />Colorado squawfish. Southwestern Naturalist 30(1):95-100. <br /> <br />13 <br />