Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'" <br /> <br />exception of fungus. Greatest incidence of parasitism was in the Yampa <br />River with 41. 5 per cent of all fish examined. Next high was Echo Park <br />with 31.3 per cent and third was M::lnument Headquarters (Split M:>unta1n) <br />with 22.2 per cent infestation. <br /> <br />l)8mage to the fisb was difficult to estimate. The very poor condition <br />~ . the cham1el. catfish could certainly be due in part to the paras ites. <br />Deformity of t~ fins could be traced in many instances to ~eat numbers <br />~ tbeparasites on the fin base. One small squawtish showed possible <br />bl1ndr1ess in one eye due to the presence of three copepod parasites near <br />it. All fish vith the copepods shOl-1ed white ulcerous growth near the <br />po1ut of attacbmen.t. These copepods can and ho.ve caused serious problems <br />with trout shouli this habitat ever become that type of stream. <br /> <br />Effectiveness 2!. sampling gear <br /> <br />rt hae been clearly demonstrated that the most effective sampl1n8 <br />proee4ure for the Green and Yampa Rivers 1s to assemble rather sizeable <br />working crews that are tully equipped l1ith electrofishing devices I large <br />and sma.ll seines (Figure 5) and fish toxins for small side channels. <br />Altboush daily sampling efforts were made by ltr. Banks, with a variety <br />~ gear that can normally be handled by one man" the massive physical <br />problems and fluctuations of the Green River made sam,pling difficult and <br />unrewarding at times. As previously mentioned, gUl nets could not be <br />used ettectively Wltil the end of the summer. Hoop nets and tyke nets <br />were also of little value. Throw lines caught fish, and in 'ltJS,'tty instances <br />the only large fish. It is of great interest to note that these lines <br />took fish only next to the shore. Beyond the third hook, about ten to <br />fifteen feet, no fish ",ere ever taken. Certa1nl;y this suggests that most <br />tishdid not venture far into the swUt and turbulent waters. <br /> <br />lor one man efforts, Mr'. Eanks found a small push net quite effective <br />in talting small fish. For many collect ions he enlisted the aid of park <br />Service personnel or visitors in his sampling areas. <br /> <br />For the bottom samples and plankton samples needed, an ordinary <br />Surber square foot bottom sampler and standard plankton net were adequate. <br /> <br />October ~ r.esults <br /> <br />On October 12, Dr. Hagen traveled to Dinosaur National M:>nument to <br />Eke necessary arrangements with Park Service personnel for an extensive <br />s~l1ng expedition to cover the same stations investigated in october ot <br />1961. Mr. Eanks and Dr. Hagen visited several of the sites on the Green <br />and Yampa Rivers and made several preliminary observations and checks on <br />the following two days. <br /> <br />Dr. Hagen returned to the M:>nument uith 14 students on October 19. <br />The Dlen were divid"'d into two survey parties. .Crc~r No. 'l thoroughly . <br /> <br />=7= <br /> <br />- <br />