My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9315 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9315 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:11:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9315
Author
Harvey, M. D. and R. A. Mussetter.
Title
Evaluation of the Required Frequency of Bar Forming Events and 2-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Modeling at Colorado Squawfish Spawning Sites in the Lower Yampa Canyon, Colorado.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />reaches unaffected by planform-induced backwater at higher flows and must have been transported <br />through the upstream pool in 1995. These sediment supply reaches are located upstream of the deeply I <br />incised meandering reach that characterizes the Yampa River downstream of Harding Hole (RM 20). <br />These result~ therefore, that a rather moderate discharge of relatively long duration may be <br />sufficient to maintain the spawning bar at Mathers Hole. <br />2.2. Cleopatras Couch (RM 16.5) <br />At Cleopatras Couch, the five original cross sections surveyed in 1983,1984,1991, and 1993 <br />were resurveyed (XS1-XS5) and three new cross sections were surveyed and monumented upstream <br />of the spawning bar (XS6, XS7, XS8) (Figure 2.5). Cross Sections 6 and 7 are located in the pool <br />upstream of the bar, and XS8 is located at the head of the next upstream riffle. The water's edge at a <br />main channel discharge of 516 cfs for all of the chute channels and the main channel were also surveyed, <br />to better define the planform characteristics of the spawning bar. Discharge measurements were made <br />in the left and right chute channels (Figure 2.5). Six Wolman Counts were made at locations where the <br />sediments had been previously sampled (Figure 2.5). The gradations from the 1995 Wolman Counts are <br />shown on Figure 2.6. <br />Comparison of the 1995 cross section plots with those from 1993 indicates that there may have <br />been some lowering of the thalweg at each of the cross sections (Appendix B). However, the most <br />significant changes since the initial survey in 1983 occurred at XS1, XS2, and XS3 where the chute <br />channel widened and, to some extent, the thalweg lowered. It appears, therefore, that channel widening <br />has occurred following the extreme runoff events of 1983 and 1984 when significant deposition occurred <br />on the bar and in the chute channels. The widening trend indicated by the cross section surveys supports <br />previous qualitative assessments of the changes in channel width that were made on the basis of <br />comparisons of pre- and post-1983 photographs of the spawning bar. The changes in channel geometry <br />have caused changes in the proportions of the total flows in the two chute channels. In 1991 at a total <br />flow of 1208 cfs, (52 percent of the flow) was in the left channel. In 1993 at a total flow of 301 cfs, (61 <br />percent) was in the left channel, and in 1995 at a total flow of 516 cfs, (57 percent) was located in the left <br />channel. <br />Comparison of the Wolman Count data for the Cleopatras Couch spawning bar (Table 2.2) <br />indicate that there has been a fining trend at all of the sampled locations between 1991 and 1995. On <br />average, the 050 at each of the locations has been reduced by about 20 mm. There has been only limited <br />channel adjustment at the spawning bar since 1991 when the first sediment sampling was done, and <br />therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that sediment supply from upstream has been responsible for the I I <br />change in sediment caliber because there is no local source of gravel-sized sediment. t ' t? <br /> <br />(Q @oJ CJ1 '~J I <br /> <br />2.7 <br /> <br />Mussstter Engineering. Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.