Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />" <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />where a discharge of 10,000 cfs or greater (inundation of the Cleopatras Couch bar) was maintained for <br /> <br />a period of about two months (Figure 1.2), were to: <br /> <br />. resurvey the established cross sections at Mathers Hole and Cleopatras Couch <br /> <br />. re-sample the bar sediments at both sites to determine if there had been significant changes in <br />the sizes of the sediments <br /> <br />. establish three new cross sections within the pool upstream of the spawning bar at Cleopatras <br />Couch to enable the HEC-2 model of the site to be extended upstream so tl1at sediment transport <br />through the pool could be modeled. <br /> <br />A second objective of this report was to present the results of a comparison between one- <br />dimensional (1-0) and two-dimensional (2-D) hydrodynamic modeling of the Mathers Hole spawning bar. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~) \~ ~..,.~,)c,.J,d <br />d <br />~ (~,1) <br />6- kt-A~ <br />V-Z-.~-- <br />flL '. ~.~"'-~~ <br /> <br /> <br />IIV'\J'..!;J'1tr'JN-.A..~ <br /> <br />.AJ^v-() w <br />f~0 fl. '7' t & ~ '. <br />I <br />I <br />~. nl.i <br />~r,e, '-I <br /> <br />( <br />, I <br /> <br />O-.A~~ ,.~~. -{'~..,~,l\...- <br /> <br />l..~~^-,.r J ~.., <br /> <br />.""" <br /> <br />'''2 <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />i <br />\i <br />v <br /> <br />(::::v,./'. <br /> <br />~\; <br />d)?(c) J, 1 ~ <br /> <br />~/tc~ :].c~ <br /> <br /> <br />0-- <br /> <br />1,3 <br /> <br />Mussetter Engineering. Inc. <br />