Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. 12/(\7/92 14:61 <br /> <br />'&303 945 8799 <br /> <br />COLO RIVER DIST ~~~ USFWS RIP DNVR <br /> <br />banks.. Mass failure of the banks also C3l.lSeS lWnC'Y2I of tf1e bank vegetatfan in wt8t C1ppears to be 8 <br />~ feedback mecharism. Slncethe und~ d1hsbmks (the rr~,,"i$m that steepens <br />the bank angle) occurs during reIad'wIy low ficms. I can be argJJed that the increased dur.ition cI mid <br />range taNS ~ dam ~ on the Green RiVer (Andrews. 1986) has increased the tate at <br />whfe;h the tanmf*.1s being relneJ'IC. <br /> <br />2) 'a.nnet.C8pcIci\y <br /> <br />DetmnirAdion dthe freqtJ8ncy ofowrbank tI~ ;long the sludy reach dthe QI'Mt\ Rrver <br />Is depemert an beir1J able to define the channel c:spaci;Y. To achfeve 1hIs. a number of C(OSI ~ <br />wn~ d1I'fngthefiE!ld inspecticn. At Cotionwcod BoUom,.1ha USF'WS had esttished an IFlM <br />titQ In 1980 with the eddifiODCll purpose of having a ~ mcnItDring site to investigate <br />~degnId2dfan tmIX'lsinthisJeaCh of the river. Six CfQ$$ sedronswere surveyed, tiedtcgether <br />horizDntaIIy and vedIcaIly and .morwmented. betWeen RM 55 and AM 6S. The cross sec:tiClns were <br />5UIVe)'ed at c:IisctIiug"e& cf 10.000, 5.100 and 2,600 cfs. The pdted cross secdans (pRMded by Mr. <br />George Smith,. USFWS) dearly indicale 1hat tl'O:S$ sedion geomeby 1$ depend8nt on cfascharge. (Harvey <br />BnCl W~ 1_ Anthony and Harley. 1002) and that aggradstfon/dagr.Kiatian trends sixxJId De <br />~ only on ~ conducted at similar alSCharges. Cross Hdions (transects) 2, 3. 4, and 6 were <br />relocated and ~ on 14 May. 11ilS2:1t a cfischarge ofabout 9,500 '*- The plotted cross sections <br />are attac:hed. to thls report (Appendix A). IJ.so shown on the platted c:rcss secttons are the profiles for <br />the 10,000 c::fs IUIWY In 1980y Comparisons of 1he prcfiIes fr1di~ 1hat there ha5 been very Iittte <br />changB at Bm/ of tI\a cross sections ather tThi..1'\ what Is to be expected 91\91 the minor differenceS in <br />dischar;e between the Z SUfV~ <br /> <br />Crass sections were also surveyed at 8 locations at Unknown Bottom between AM 28.5 and AM <br />31-3- The ~~ portions of the cress s!actions were rec:aded on a fathometer trace and Iat:er <br />digitized. Obsefvatfor.s (if the bank heights and inclinations were made as well and the surveyed bank <br />~es for1he CoItamvood Bottom cross sections Wen) ~ to the ~ cress sedfons <br />(on the basis of Iccaticn w<<hin the bend) i1l: the downstream locatfon. CrQ$S.section st:a:ticnir4. and <br />henclG 1ho horizontJl rn!af:ionshlp between 'the sections was awroxfmated from 1he tcpogr.!phic map. <br />(The ~ .slope 'I'r..s <JlSQ apprmcfmated from the tcpagmphic maps at the Unknawn Boltom <br />1oc:at1on.) The pfofted cross secUcns me attIched to this report (AppendiX 8). <br /> <br />The stBYt!.)'Sf C'tISS sec:lJcns at.: the two locaIians were used 10 create HEC2 rnodI3I8 for erach <br />of the reaches. II. !he Coltolawood Bottom recdl. the bankfUI: dischaIge fer the 1ndMdU31 c:rosa <br />sectians r&ng&d from 34,000 to 22,000 cf.i fur i1 Mannlng's n w1ue d 0.D3 and from 29.000 to 19,300 <br />cf$ fOr an n w.llua cZ 0.035. Average values for the reach. were 32,980 and 2B,1rrt cis fer n valuea <br />of 0.03 and o.oss, respectively. At tho Unknown Bot:tcm reach the bankfuI[ d"l9Charge for the individual <br />CI'OS5 sec:tioM ranged fron141.000 to 34,000 cis for an n value ci 0.03, and 41.900 to 30,200 cfs;'ior <br />an n Vllue ci 0.03S. Average wEu= fm" the rt:aCh were 36,240 cmd 32,B) c:fs fer n w1Ulid of 0.03 <br />and 0.035. respedlVeIy. <br /> <br />To d*tmIne the fr~ of inundtltion of the bcItomIar1dI. a flow duradon curve \WS <br />developed from mean daily flaws. for the Grer.!1 River at the Green RIver, tnm gaging station fa' the <br />period 19S3 to 1980 (Figure 1). AIsc shown on the figure is the low duration CiUI'W for the peried <br />between 1963 and 1982. developed by Andr~ws (1986). Comparison of the curves demonstrates the <br />effeds,cfthehigh.discharge YeaJ'S gf 1S83, 1S"54 and 1886 on the upper end Qftf1e ffow dumion curves. <br />At thr;l CQtlcnwoorj Bcttcm reach, the exceroence frequencies' for the resch ilVRl'SSecI bankfull <br />discharges are 1.3 percent ar'Id O-S pen::ent fur n values d o.oa and O.Q35, reapeclM3ly. The <br />exceederx::e frequencie$ trnnsIate into 4.7 GOO 2.9 day$ per yaar. No the UnIcnawn Bottom ~ch the <br />exceedence ~ for the reach avemgo b3nkf1.dI d"JSChacges are 0.4 percent and 0.3 percent for <br />n valuesdo..Cl3 and 0-035. respactiveIy. Theexc:eedence~tmnsIafe into 1.5 and 1.1 days <br />p&ry&;r. The exceedence. frequencies represent awmse valUes and they do not 1ndtcate thal bankfull <br />di$ch;lrge is l;'Y(':eE'dm fNery year. In fuel:, as the next: ~h snows, bankfull discharge at the 2 <br />sita9 has a retwn period of bmween 4 and 10 years. <br /> <br />3 Re5OtlI'Ce Consultants &. Engineers, Inc. <br /> <br />~005 <br /> <br />:.E <br /> <br />