Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />N <br /> <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />WYOMING <br /> <br />SCALE IN KILOMETERS <br />o 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 .00 <br /> <br />so 100 150 200 250 <br />SC.AL.E IN Mn..ES <br /> <br />......." <br /> <br />......,...... I <br />\, ; r--- r-,...---- <br />-...----1 .....- '\ -- <br />MEXICO ---. \ <br />\, <br /> <br />Figure 2.--Historic (light stipple) and existing <br />(dark stipple) range of the Colorado squawfish <br />in North America. <br /> <br />Holden (1973), Seethaler (1978) and others. <br />Squawfish were distributed erratically throughout <br />the basin, including the mid-lower reaches of the <br />mainstem in Utah and Colorado, and its principal <br />tributaries, the White, Gunnison, Green and Yampa <br />Rivers. The species' range as detailed by the <br />above investigators was, with some resolution, <br />fundamentally correct as revealed by subsequent <br />field studies initiated by the Colorado Division <br />of Wildlife (DOW) in 1977 and the Colorado River <br />Fisheries Project (CRFP) of the U.S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service in 1979. Critical life history <br />data were limited to observations of habitats <br />occupied by adults and timing of sexual maturity. <br />Absolutely no observations of natural spawning <br />had been documented. <br /> <br />The early life history stages of P. lucius were <br />known as a result of hatchery propagation at <br />Willow Beach National Fish Hatchery, Arizona, by <br />Toney (1974) and Hamman (1981) and larvae/ <br />juveniles were available to researchers for <br />comparison with field specimens. <br /> <br />The consensus of opinion prior to DOW/CRFP <br />studies was that if the Colorado squawfish <br />spawned at all in Colorado, it would be in the <br />lower mainstem. The Yampa River was believed to <br />be very near the edge of the species' range and <br />far too small to support spawning for such a <br />large fish. <br /> <br />THE LOWER YAMPA RIVER ECOSYSTEM <br /> <br />The Yampa River (fig. 2) is the principal tribu- <br />tary of the Green River sub-basin. It heads in <br />the Park and Gore ranges and the Flattop <br />Mountains in northcentral Colorado and flows <br />north to Steamboat Springs (Routt County) where <br />it turns west to the Green River confluence in <br />Dinosaur National Monument (Moffat County). The <br />river is approximately 200 mi in length, and the <br />last 47 mi are wholly within the boundaries of <br />the national monument. The Yampa exhibits wide <br />annual fluctuations in physicochemical charac- <br />teristics, due largely to its snowpack dependence <br />and the semi-arid nature of the watershed over a <br />great Pjrt of its course. Flows can range from <br /><100 ft /sec during the base flo~ period of <br />September-February to >20,000 ft /sec during the <br />last week of May when peak flows are typically <br />recorded. Water temperatures similarly fluctuate <br />widely, i.e., from 1.0 C (winter) to approxi- <br />mately 30 C (July and August). Turbidity (nap- <br />thalmic turbidity units) ranges from <1.0 during <br />fall-winter base flows to >100 during peak runoff <br />and following prolonged storms (USGS 1983; <br />O'Brien 1984). Color is brown to brick-red <br />during runoff and often through August. The <br />Yampa River in Dinosaur National Monument has a <br />mejn annual flow of approximately 50 billion <br />ft (National Park Service 1979) and it is the <br />last large free-flowing river on Colorado's <br />western slope. In contrast with the mainstem <br />Colorado River and its other principal tribu- <br />taries, present Yampa flows appear to approximate <br />historical discharge patterns with normal sea- <br />sonal fluctuations. <br /> <br />The lowermost 46 mi of the Yampa River are <br />entirely contained within deep canyons (Yampa <br />Canyon). Because of the Canyon's geology, the <br />river may be subdivided into an upper, high- <br />gradient reach (river mi 46-20) characterized by <br />a boulder-cobble substrate and a lower, low- <br />gradient reach (RM 20-0) where sands and silts <br />increasingly replace the large boulders. <br />Riverine habitat varies from major/minor rapids <br />and eddies, particular.ly in the upper reach, to <br />relatively deep, quiet pools and braided sections <br />interspersed with cobble bars in the lower reach <br />(O'Brien 1984). <br /> <br />As is the case with essentially all reaches of <br />the Colorado River system, several species of <br />exotic fishes have become established in the <br />Yampa River (Haynes and Muth 1984) and introduced <br />tamerisk (Tamarix gallica) is becoming estab- <br />lished on the beaches. However, unlike the dam- <br />controlled Green River with which it joins, <br />relatively natural seasonal Yampa flows have <br />maintained a largely native riparian ecosystem <br />with deposition of driftwood and local cottonwood <br />(Populus fremonti) germination during wet years. <br /> <br />Field studies in Yampa Canyon are logistically <br />difficult, requiring travel by inflatable raft <br />and canoes and fish sampling is inefficient, at <br />best. Studies, with the expressed intent of <br />determining the likelihood of squawfish spawning <br />in the lower Yampa River, were initiated in <br /> <br />190 <br />