Laserfiche WebLink
<br />422 BIOLOGICAL REPoRT 19 <br /> <br />Kennedy 1982), was adjustment of the initial bed- <br />sediment diameters to account for the spatial het- <br />erogeneity not reflected in the sparse field meas- <br />urements available. <br />Once the model had been verified, it was used <br />to study a series of schematic scenarios in the <br />interest of identifying the primary cause of the <br />degradation and forecasting future degradation. <br />These scenarios were as follows: <br />81: Nominal2O-year simulation, a continuation <br />of the 1960-80 verification run. <br />82: Effect of out-of-basin diversion, simulated <br />by reducing the Gavins Point Dam releases by an <br />average of 116 ems (4,100 cfs) over the annual <br />cycle. <br />84: Effect of channelization, studied by widen- <br />ing the navigation channel from 183 to 244 m. <br />85: Effect of channelization, studied by widen- <br />ing the navigation channel from 183 to 305 m. <br />88: Effect of artificial armoring as a means of <br />local degradation control, studied by increasing by <br />about 10% the amount of bed sediment between 2.4 <br />and 19.1 mm. <br />89: Effect of modulation of Gavins Point Dam <br />releases, studied by constant release of the mean <br />annual discharge of 823 ems (29,000 cfs). <br />Figure 4 shows the computed time-evolution of <br />bed level at 8ioux City, Iowa, under these various <br />scenarios. The initial rapid degradation for all <br />runs is caused by the use of an initial armoring <br />factor of zero, thereby failing to account for any <br />residual protection of the bed surface by interlock~ <br />ing immobile particles in 1980. All the runs tend <br />to reach a kind of equilibrium in 2-6 years. Then <br />all but run 85 show the effects of the arrival of the <br />degradation wave from upstream. The asymptotic <br />approach to a new equilibrium is visible from about <br />15 years onward. <br />Runs 82 and 89 show that reduction and modu- <br />lation of the mainstem water inflow can reduce the <br /> <br />2.5 <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br />~ 2.0 <br />~ <br />o <br />~ 1.5 <br />Cl <br />w <br />o <br />w 1.0 <br />> <br />~ <br />=> 0.5 <br />::;; <br />=> <br />o <br /> <br />~~:--:,.-_.. <br /> <br />.--:::::::-::.:;;;;;;~-;;;:::-~~;:;.;-;;.~:'"~~."'~~~.~",.... <br /> <br />--------------------- <br /> <br />.. _.. -.. SI: NOMINAL 2O-YEAR SIMULATION <br />- S2: UPSTREAM DIVERSION <br />--- - - - $4: 6O-METER WIDENING <br />- --- S5: 120-METER WIDENING <br />............... S8: LOCALIZED ARTIFICIALAAMORlNG <br />.-.-.- S9:S1CAIlYFLOWAT822CMS <br /> <br />'~ <br />Ji <br />ji <br />j <br />,\ <br />] <br />,'11 <br />,1 <br /> <br />00 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />8 10 12 <br />TIME (YEARS) <br /> <br /> <br />ultimate degradation by about 10 and 20 em, re- <br />spectively. Runs 84 and S8 show that a 61-m wid- <br />ening and artificial armoring could reduce the ulti- <br />mate degradation by about 30 em. Run 85 shows <br />that a 122-m widening, which represents a return <br />to nearly the pre-channelization natural-channel <br />width, would virtually eliminate further degrada- <br />tion, though possibly at the expense of maintaining <br />adequate navigation depths for part of the year. <br />Analysis of similar results for these and other sce- <br />narios at all computational points of the model can <br />be found in Holly and Karim (1983). Additional <br />analyses of the effect of the Platte River sediment <br />Inflow in arresting degradation at and below <br />Omaha can be found in Holly et al. (1986). <br />Although this Missouri River model has not been <br />in active use in the past few years, it could be used <br />to~~~ersedime~m~~mscenariosm <br />:relevance to wildlife habitat. These could include: <br />recovery of the temporal pattern. of the natural <br />(pre-dam) hydrograph, perhaps with some storage <br />modulation; development of a sediment-bypass sys- <br />tem for Gavins Point Dam; and artificial sediment <br />supply to the tailwater of Gavins Point Dam. <br /> <br />Simulation Deficiencies <br /> <br />Although the Missouri River application has <br />been presented somewhat optimistically, mobile- <br />bed modelling is still in the dark ages insofar as <br />reliable fidelity to physical processes is concerned, <br />especially in 1-0 applications. A few of the more <br />prominent weaknesses and areas of concern are <br />listed below. <br /> <br />Spatial Averaging <br /> <br />In their inability to resolve spatial heterogene- <br />ity of bed sediment and transport within a cross <br /> <br />..-..--.-.. <br /> <br />Fig. 4. Cumulative computed degrada- <br />tion at Sioux City, 1980-2000. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />18 20 <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />