My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7147
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7147
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:10:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7147
Author
Holden, P. B. and C. B. Stalnaker
Title
Distribution and Abundance of Mainstream Fishes of the Middle and Upper Colorado River Basins, 1967-1973
USFW Year
1975
USFW - Doc Type
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />;:~~ <br /> <br />HOLDEN AND STALNAKER-COLORADO RIVER FISHES <br /> <br />223 <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />abundant throughout their range. Older <br />fishermen remembered catching them <br />readily as youths. Jordan (1891) seined <br />several from the Gunnison River near <br />Delta and at Green River, Utah. Thus, <br />once a common fish, it is now very rare. <br />Humpback chub complex-Gila cypha <br />Miller. Members of the humpback chub <br />complex were collected in areas 2, 3, 4, <br />and 11. Most specimens were taken from <br />eddies adjacent to fast currents. Only 61 <br />were taken. Of these, 26 were collected <br />near Echo Park in areas 2 and 3 in 1969, <br />most from one eddy. Fifteen were taken in <br />area 11 in 1967; only one was taken in the <br />same area with increased effort in 1970, <br />suggesting a decrease in abundance had <br />occurred. Young chubs collected in area 4, <br />had noticeable nuchal humps and other <br />characters suggesting they were of the <br />humpback chub complex. Juveniles were <br />not found in any other area. <br />The humpback chub was first described <br />by Miller (1946) and has been seldom col- <br />lected since that time. Smith (1960) re- <br />ported 18 from Hideout Canyon of the <br />Flaming Gorge basin, most from one small <br />area. Sigler and Miller (1963) reported it <br />from the Colorado River near Moab, Utah, <br />and the White River near Bonanza, Utah. <br />Utah and Alizona Fish and Game person- <br />nel collected numerous members of this <br />complex in Lake Powell in the early-mid <br />1960's (Holden and Stalnaker 1970). Few <br />specimens have been seen there recently <br />(Steve Gloss, Utah Division of Wildlife Re- <br />sources, personal communication). Miller <br />(1955) repOlied remains of this group from <br />archaeological sites in the lower Colorado <br />basin. Thus, this form ranged throughout <br />the main stream of the Colorado basin, <br />and it appears doubtful that it was abun- <br />dant in the 20th Century as few published <br />accounts are available. <br />Colorado squawfish-Ptychocheilus lu- <br />cius Gl:rarJ. Colorado squawfish were col- <br />lected throughout the study area in small <br />numbers. Three hundred adults were col- <br />lected, 261 of these from area 2. <br />Young-of-the-year squawfish were col- <br />lected in area 4 in 1971 .nd 1972 and in <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />" <br />, <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />area 5 in 1970 and 1971. Juveniles were <br />abundant around Echo Park in 1968, but <br />very few were caught in 1969 and none <br />could be located in 1970 or 1971, undoubt- <br />edly a reflection of poor spawning success. <br />Reasons for this are unknown as the num- <br />bers of adults did not decrease. Vanicek <br />and Kramer (1969) found that successful <br />spawning was the rule, with very few weak <br />year classes of squawfish in this area. <br />Juveniles were collected in small num- <br />bers in areas 4 and 5 throughout the study. <br />Three .juveniles were collected in area 7 in <br />1971. <br />Adults were collected in all habitat types <br />but mainly in slow water (eddies,backwa- <br />ters, and flooded canyon mouths). <br />Juveniles were caught in backwater areas <br />and small eddies typically 60-90 cm deep. <br />Young of the year were taken in shallow, <br />warm, stagnant areas usually between a <br />sandbar and the bank. <br />Congregations of ripe male squawfish <br />were collected in area 2 in July and early <br />August of each year, 1968-70. The origins <br />of this migration are not known, although <br />reproduction is the hypothesized purpose <br />(Holden and Stalnaker 1974). One or two <br />squawfish were taken by fishermen each <br />year in Lake Powell, but no large numbers <br />have been noted (Steve Gloss, Utah Divi- <br />sion of Wildlife Resources, personal com- <br />munication). <br />Colorado squawfish have been repOlied <br />to reach at least 36 kg and 150 cm in <br />length (Jordan and Evermann 1896). The <br />largest specimens seen dUJing the study <br />were not weighed but were estimated at 7 <br />kg. Older fishermen rccall catching a fair <br />number of fish near 22 kg, and stories of <br />larger fish were common till the 1930's. <br />Several reasons for the decline were cited <br />by fisherman, the most common being <br />construction of dams. This fish has appar- <br />ently suffered great reductions in popula- <br />tion size within the last 30 to 40 years. <br />Speckled dace -Rhinichthys osculus <br />Girard. The native speckled dace was col- <br />lected throughout the sLndy area. It was <br />abundant in most areas, but less common <br />in large, warm sections of the Il1<L i'l\'Crs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.