Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SELENIVv[ IN RAZORBACK SLCKERS IN GREEN RIVER. UTAH <br /> <br />[~l <br /> <br />Selenium concentrations in eggs could result in slightly <br />higher concentrations in hatched larvae because the chorion <br />membrane probably would not contribute much selenium <br />to the egg, yet would contribute mass. Selenium in fish eggs <br />is carried as part of the yolk precursor proteins lipovitellin <br />and phosvitin and is incorporated into egg immunoglobulin <br />and vitellogenin and transferred to yolk molecules (Kroll <br />and Doroshov, 1991). <br />The selenium in larvae in the present study may also have <br />come from waterborne and dietary uptake of selenium. <br />Although larvae were probably less than a month old at the <br />time of capture by light trap, they would have been exposed <br />to selenium and other inorganic elements in water since <br />hatching, and in food organisms since initiation of feeding at <br />about 4-5 days old. Several reports have documented elev- <br />ated selenium concentrations in water and biota at Brush <br />Creek, Stewart lake Drain, Ashley Creek, Sportsman's <br />Lake, and Sheppard Bottom, which all have contributed <br />selenium loading to the Green River (Stephens et al., 1988, <br />1992; Peltz and WaddelL 1991; Waddell and Wiens, 1994a). <br />This selenium loading has resulted in elevated selenium in <br />adult razorback sucker and contributed to the exposure of <br />larvae and their concomitant accumulation of selenium. <br /> <br />Selenium Hazards to Razorback Sucker <br /> <br />Selenium concentrations in larvae from the present study <br />were higher than concentrations in fish from control treat- <br />ments in laboratory studies with water, diet, or combined <br />water and diet exposures, or reference sites in field studies <br />(0.4-2.0Ilg/g; Table 3). The geometric inean for selenium <br />reported in the National Contaminant Biomonitoring Pro- <br />gram (NCBP) for 315 composite samples of whole-body <br />adult fish (47 taxa) collected from 109 stations nationwide in <br />late 1984 to early 1985 (Schmitt and Brumbaugh, 1990) was <br />1.6 Ilg/g and the 85th percentile was 2.8 Ilg/g. The 85th <br />percentile is an arbitrary value used to identify values that <br />are substantially above the nationwide median and possibly <br />of concern, although the 85th percentile concentration has <br />no toxicological significance. Selenium concentrations of <br />about 4 Ilg/g or more in whole-body of young fish exposed <br />through dietary or waterborne exposures have been asso- <br />ciated with adverse effects (Table 4), Although some of the <br />waterborne exposures may seem high in Table 4, the main <br />point of the table is the values for whole-body residue and <br />the resulting adverse effect. Once whole-body selenium <br />reaches a toxic threshold concentration (i.e., 4 Ilg/g), regard- <br />less of exposure route, adverse effects will occur. Based on <br />the literature given in Table 4 and information from several <br />other laboratory and field studies with a variety of fish <br />species, lemly (1993) recommended that whole-body resi- <br />dues of selenium in fish of 4Ilg/g, regardless of exposure <br />route, be taken as the toxic threshold for adverse effects. <br />This toxic threshold was equaled or exceeded in the residues <br /> <br />in larval razorback sucker collected from the five sites in the <br />present study (Table I). <br />One of the cited studies in Table 4 involved feeding larval <br />razorback sucker selenium-laden zooplankton collected <br />from sites in Sheppard Bottom at Ouray NWR (Hamilton et <br />al., 1996). In that study, 5-, 10-, 24-. and 28-day-old larvae <br />tested in four experiments experienced nearly complete <br />mortality in 20-25 days after feeding on zooplankton from <br />three to six sites with selenium concentrations in zooplank- <br />ton ranging from 2.3 to 96Ilg/g. Whole-body residues in <br />these fish ranged from 3.6 to 94 Ilgjg. The range of residues <br />in larvae demonstrates the variation that can occur in sur- <br />viving fish, but from a toxicological standpoint, adverse <br />effect concentrations are always linked with the lowest treat- <br />ment or residue concentration associated with the observed <br />adverse effect (Rand and Petrocelli, 1985). In the Ouray <br />study, mortality occurred concurrently in larvae fed zo- <br />oplankton from the six sites, which suggests that a toxic <br />threshold was exceeded. The concentrations of selenium in <br />zooplankton and larvae from the three least selenium con- <br />taminated sites (2.3 to 4.5 Ilg/g in zooplankton and 3.6 to <br />14.3Ilg/g in larvae) were close to or higher than the toxic <br />thresholds (3 Ilg/g in diet and 4 Ilg/g in whole-body) pro- <br />posed by Lemly (1993) and supported by the results of <br />studies summarized in Table 4. <br />As with any normal, bell-shaped distribution of responses <br />in a group of individuals to a stimulus, some individuals will <br />be adversely affected at low levels of stimulus, i.e., selenium <br />residues less than the mean response, whereas some indi- <br />viduals will not be adversely affected until levels of stimulus <br />are higher than the mean, i.e., selenium residues greater than <br />the mean response. One misconception of threshold concen- <br />trations is that once a threshold is exceeded, all organisms <br />are adversely affected on an equal basis. Toxic thresholds <br />are usually based on the response of the most sensitive <br />species tested, but there may be other untested species with <br />greater sensitivity and others with less sensitivity to a stres- <br />sor. Likewise, within a species, sensitivity is usually greatest <br />in very young life stages, and within a life stage, sensitivity <br />will vary among individuals. Also, threshold values may be <br />affected by other inorganic or organic contaminants or <br />synergistic or antagonistic interactions between con- <br />taminants. Consequently, threshold values should be used <br />with caution. <br />Some fish in the Ouray study (Hamilton et al., 1996) died <br />with lower whole-body concentrations of selenium than <br />selenium concentrations in live, wild larvae collected in the <br />present study (assumes that fish drying in a treatment have <br />the same toxicant concentration as fish still alive in that <br />treatment). Sato et al. (1980) reported that selenium concen- <br />trations in dead carp (e. carpio) from two experiments with <br />waterborne selenium were lower than those in live fish <br />sampled during the experiments, which shows the difference <br />in sensitivity that can occur between individuals of a single <br />