Laserfiche WebLink
<br />H-Cl\ ~"e,sr /V\odd c: <br />tQCf0 <br /> <br />North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16:905-912, 1996 <br />American Fisheries Society 1996 <br /> <br />O'7~07 <br /> <br />------ <br /> <br />Evaluation of Marking Techniques to Estimate Population Size <br />and First-Year Survival of Colorado Squawfish <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />G. BRUCE HAINES AND TIMOTHY MODDE <br /> <br />u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service, Colorado River Fish Project <br />266 West JOO North, Suite 2, Vernal, Utah 84078, USA <br /> <br />Abstract.-Three marking methods-tattoo ink injected with a dental inoculator, an elastic poly- <br />mer injected by syringe, and fin clipping-were tested to determine a suitable technique for <br />estimating population size, sur\;'ival, and movement of age-O Colorado squawfish Ptychocheilus <br />lucius. Laboratory tests indicated that all three marks were retained at sufficient rates (>97%) to <br />make population estimates over a 2I-d period. However, fish marked with tattoo ink had higher <br />mortality (10%) than fish marked with elastic polymer (< 1%) or with a fin clip (0%). Fish marked <br />with the elastic polymer had higher retention (85%) than those marked with fin clips (34%) or <br />tattoo ink (26%) after 142 d. No differences in vulnerability to predation were observed among <br />fish with the three marks or between marked and unmarked fish. A field test of the elastic polymer <br />showed that it was easy to use, caused low mortality (5% for fish held overnight in live-cages), <br />and produced marks that were readily visible. Mark-recapture methods were used to estimate <br />population size of Colorado squaw fish (5,595 in the autumn and 2,523 the following spring) and <br />winter survival (45%). Survival estimates from mark-recapture data were more accurate and precise <br />than those from catch-per-unit-effort data, at least for short-term studies in river reaches less than <br />50 km long. Simulations showed that doubling the size of the study section and increasing the <br />probability of capture by 33% would reduce possible bias from 14.5% to 1.4% and the coefficient <br />of variation (SE/mean) from 0.25 to 0.06. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />Survival during the first year of life is a primary <br />factor. determining year-class strength for most <br />temperate-zone fishes (Oliver et al. 1979; Shuter <br />and Post 1990) and may be an important factor <br />limiting recruitment for Colorado squawfish <br />Ptychocheilus lucius in the upper Colorado River <br />basin (Kaeding and Osmundson 1988; Thompson <br />et al. 1991). However, identifying the magnitude <br />of winter mortality of age-O fish has been difficult, <br />in part because of the lack of an adequate marking <br />technique for small fishes (<60 mm total length, <br />TL). In the absence of a suitable marking method, <br />catch per unit effort (CPUE) in backwaters, the <br />primary habitat occupied in autumn and spring <br />(Tyus 1991), has been used as a population size <br />index for estimating relative year-class strength of <br />Colorado squawfish (Tyus and Haines 1991). Sur- <br />vival estimates based on CPUE have required the <br />assumption of equal vulnerability of capture in au- <br />'I <br />tumn and spring, whereas those based on mark- <br />recapture do not and may provide more accurate <br />and precise estimates. <br />Dyes have been used successfully for marking <br />several fish species (David 1955; Arnold 1966; <br />Nielson 1992). Kelly (1967) reported that injected <br /> <br />1 Mention of trade names or commercia] products does <br />not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service. <br /> <br />dyes were useful in some instances, but were im- <br />practical for marking small fish. Hart and Pitcher <br />(1969) and Laufle et al. (1990) successfully <br />marked small fish by using air-injected tattoo ink. <br />Northwest Marine Technology (Shaw Island, <br />Washington 1), recently developed a fluorescent <br />elastic polymer that is applied by syringe injection <br />and shows promise for marking small fish. Al- <br />though methods exist to mark small fish, the du- <br />rability of the marks and the individual size and <br />species on which these methods are effective vary. <br />No information is available on the susceptibility <br />to predation or delayed mortality from handling <br />and injection for fish marked with these techniques <br />(Moring 1990). <br />The objectives of this study were to (1) compare <br />fish survival and mark retention rates among three <br />marking procedures, (2) compare the vulnerability <br />of marked fish to predation, and (3) determine the <br />applicability of mark-recapture methods to esti- <br />mate population size and winter survival of Col- <br />orado squawfish. <br /> <br />Methods <br /> <br />Marking procedures.-Three marking meth- <br />ods-tattoo ink injected with a dental inoculator, <br />an elastic polymer injected by syringe, and fin clip- <br />ping-were tested for persistence and percent re- <br />tention at a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service fish <br />hatchery at Ouray, Utah. The fish used for labo- <br /> <br />905 <br />