Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />208 <br /> <br />Hubbs and Miller <br /> <br />Hybridization between Catostomus and Xyrauchen <br /> <br />209 <br /> <br />\ . <br /> <br />peduncle, Haring caudal fin, long lips with seriated papillae, large <br />fins, and other features indicate that one parental species in the <br />upper river system is C. latipinnis rather than C. commersoni suck- <br />lel/i Girard or C. catostomus griseus Girard, both of which have re~ <br />cently been transplanted there from the Mississippi watershed. <br />The species of Catostomus that hybridizes with Xyrauchen in the <br />Gila River system is presumed to be C. insignis for two reasons: <br />(1) C. insignis was taken with the hybrids and Xyrauchen, and (~) <br />the hybrids s~ow specific points of intermediacy between C. insignis <br />and X. texanus. They differ significantly from the C. latipinni.', X <br />X. texanus hybrids from the upper Colorado system. Thus the <br />caudal peduncle in the C. insignis X X. texanus hybrids is deeper <br />on the average than in X. texanus, as expected, since C. ins ignis <br />has a deeper peduncle than X. texanus (Table VII), wher~as the C. <br />lati:pinnis X X. texanus specimens have a slenderer peduncle than <br />in X. texanus, again as expected, since C. latipinnis has the slen- <br />derest peduncle of any of the forms involved (Table V; PI. I). In <br />thi'i respect the hybrids of the two combinations are strikingly un- <br />~ik(:: in the C. in.~ignis X X. texanus hybrids the peduncular depth <br />IS .093-.099 of the standard length; in the other hybrid combina- <br />tion it is .076-.083. Similar contrast is shown in the number of <br />sca les, which is lowest in C. insignis and highest in C. latipinnis <br />with the averages intermediate in each hybrid combination (Tabl~ <br />II). <br />That the other parental species in both areas is the huge hump- <br />back sucker, Xyrauchen texanus (Abbott), admits of no reasonable <br />dou.bt, for the hybrids exhibit, in diluted form, some of the unique <br />features of that bizarre fish, including its great nuchal hump. <br />Xymuchen is one of the several genera of fishes that are endemic to <br />the Colorado River system (Miller, 1946a). <br />. The possibility that the fish here interpreted as hybrids may <br />Instead represent a distinct species, uncompahgre, intermediate <br />between Catostomus and Xyrauchen, or that they maybe referable to <br />two such species, seems excluded by circumstantial evidence. Fish <br />of this type have been collected only four times, a sin'gle specimen <br />twiee and six specimens twice. These collections have been well' <br />separated, spatially as well a.s temporally (1889, 19~6, 1947, and <br />1950). Furthermore, these aberrant specimens agree with known <br />hybrids not only in exhibiting characters intermediate between those <br /> <br />of the inferred parental species, but also, as noted above, in being <br />specifically intermediate between the particular local forms of the <br />parental genera. Furthermore, in certain respects, such as the <br />number of scales and the ,structure of the lips, the hybrids between <br />C. latipinnis and X. texanus are far more variable than we would <br />expect a species to be. <br />The criteria adopted in recognizing these new natural hybrids, <br />the methods followed in accumulating and analyzing the data, and <br />the style accepted in presenting the material are essentially the same <br />as those employed by Hubbs, Hubbs, and Johnson (1943, pp. 11-14, <br />63-73). <br />We thank Dr. Leonard P. Schultz and his staff for wholehearted <br />cooperation in our studies of pertinent specimens in the United <br />,States National Museum (U.S.N.M.). Material recently collected <br />in Utah by Dr. W. F. Sigler has proved of critical value. He, <br />along with Dr. Samuel Eddy, of the University of Minnesota <br />(U.M.), and Dr. William M. Lewis, of Southern Illinois University, <br />have cooperated in providing specimens which had been distributed. <br />The other material used is in the University of Michigan Museum <br />of Zoology (U.M.M.Z.). Robert L. Wisner took some of the X-ray <br />photographs. William L. Cristanelli drafteo the graphs and took <br />some of the photographs. Laura C. Hubbs has again contributed <br />her services, especially in the computations. <br /> <br />Catostomuslatipinnis X Xyrauchen texanus <br /> <br />(Pis. I-III) <br /> <br />U.S.N.M., No. 7599~: one wholly immature male 10~ mm. in <br />standard length, the holotype and only reported specimen of X yr- <br />auchen uncompahgre Jordan and EverIDann (in Jordan, 1891, pp. <br />~6-~7, pI. 5, fig. 1~), collected by David S. Jordan, Barton W. Ever- <br />mann, and party in Uncompahgre River close to Delta, Colorado; <br />August 14, 1889. <br />U.S.N.M., No. 143594: one wholly immature female ~56 mm. <br />long, seined by Preston and Dorothy Knoch in the Colorado River <br />one-half mile below Fruita Bridge, Mesa County, Colorado; Sep- <br />tember, 1947. <br />U.M.M.Z., No. 16~334 (five specimens), and U.M., No. 1634~ <br />(one specimen): two emaciated males 385 and 391 mm. long, with <br />