My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7155
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7155
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:08:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7155
Author
Holden, P. B., W. White and G. Somerville
Title
Threatened Fishes of Utah
USFW Year
1974
USFW - Doc Type
51, Part 2
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />HOLDEN, ET AL.: THREATENED FISHES OF UTAH <br /> <br />S6 <br /> <br />group. Any further alteration of the Colorado River System should be <br />discouraged. <br /> <br />Virgin River Fishes <br /> <br />Gila Tobusta seminuda- Virgin River Chub <br /> <br />Status: Endangered subspecies <br />Description: Taxonomy of the Virgin River chub is uncertain, as its asso- <br />ciation with the Pahranagat roundtail (G.T. joTdani)and roundtail chub <br />(G.T. Tobusta) is unclear. This discussion is limited to the roundtaiI of the <br />Virgin River, G.T. seminuda. Descriptions of this form are lacking; Holden <br />and Stalnaker (1970) examined six specimens and Miller (1946) examined <br />the five type specimens. Major differences between G.T. seminuda andG.T. <br />Tobusta were dorsal fin rays 9.10 (9.3) and 9 respectively, gill rakers 24-31 <br />(27.7) and 20-28 (24) respectively, and vertebrae 40-42 (40.7) and 41-44 <br />(42.2) respectively. The original description of seminuda stressed an <br />absence of scales on ventral and dorsal areas. This character was found to <br />be variable in Gila robusta throughout the Colorado basin (Holden and <br />Stalnaker, 1970). The Virgin River chub is very silvery, as are other Virgin <br />River fish. <br />Documentation: Original range of the Virgin River chub was the Virgin <br />River up to La Verkin Spring near Hurricane, Utah. Much of the lower <br />Virgin River is now flooded by Lake Mead. The chub was very abundant in <br />the Utah section of the river in the late 19601. Recent studies by Cross and <br />Deacon (1973) did not find this form above the mouth of Beaver Dam <br />Wash, Arizona, or in Utah except at La Verkin Spring. They found it to be <br />more common below Beaver Dam Wash in Arizona and Nevada. It is based <br />on this recent and apparently drastic reduction in the Utah and part of the <br />Arizona population and the loss of habitat due to Lake Mead that the <br />endangered status is believed warranted. Dr. James Deacon (University of <br />Nevada, Las Vegas) considers this chub the most threatened of the Virgin <br />River fishes. <br />FactoTs Influencing Decline: Factors causinc the recent decrease in Virgin <br />River chub populations are unknown. <br /> <br />Plagopterus aTgentissimus- Woundfin <br /> <br />Status: Endangered species <br />Description: The wound fin is a member of the tribe Plagopterini, a unique <br />group of minnows endemic to the Lower Colorado River basin. This tribe <br />is characterized by spines in the dorsal and pelvic fins. The woundfUl is <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />'W',' <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />+- <br /> <br />.; <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.