Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />ECOLOGY OF RIVERINE FISHES IN REGULATED STREAM SYSTEMS <br /> <br />63 <br /> <br />number and size of inflowing streams. The channel of the Colorado <br />River was lowered for 148 kID below Hoover Dam by the removal of <br />over 115 million cubic meters of bed material from 1935 to 1951 <br />(Gottschalk, 1964). <br /> <br />Another factor that influences riverine fishes in regulated <br />streams is predation or competition from introduced species (Kimsey, <br />1957; Long and Krcma, 1969). At times, exotic fish are introduced <br />for their sporting potential, and, therefore, the impact is immediate. <br />In situations where there is no mass injection of fish, that natural <br />movement and establishment of piscivorous or competitive species may <br />take several years. <br /> <br />Buildup of toxic gases (HzS) (Ford, 1963) or the depletion of <br />a required gas (OZ) (Koryak, 1976) are delayed impacts in tailwaters <br />due to maturation in the upstream reservoir. These problems gener~ <br />ally affect tailwaters for only a short distance, as aeration tends <br />to normalize the situation. <br /> <br />The synergistic effect of two or more altered factors in down- <br />stream areas appears to be a potential problem worthy of future <br />study. A rather slow change in downstream habitat could very grad- <br />ually shift conditions so that an exotic or natural competitor or <br />predator gradually becomes more favored and therefore displaces a <br />riverine species. As the habitat becomes marginal for the obligate <br />riverine species, it becomes more preferred for the exotic competi- <br />tor. At that point, the obligate species becomes more detrimentally <br />impacted by the exotic species than by the habitat change. <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />Whether a factor is immediate or delayed, the ultimate impact <br />of regulation on obligate riverine fishes depends on the degree of <br />change and the tolerance level of the fish to that change. In <br />general, the least tolerant (most highly adapted) species tend to <br />sustain the greatest impact of regulation (Pfitzer, 1963; Lewis, <br />1974; Trautman and Gartman, 1974; Blake, 1977; Edwards, 1978). In <br />warm-water areas in the eastern and southern U.S., where diverse <br />fish faunas are common, tailwater species are usually repiaced by <br />other native species where changes are not drastic (Pfitzer, 1963; <br />Spence and Hynes, 1971). Drastic changes, such as a reduction in <br />summer temperature from warm to cold, usually displace all native <br />fishes, and exotic species such as planted rainbow trout usually <br />predominate. In the more arid Southwest, with its relatively <br />depauperate but highly specialized fish fauna, regulation tends <br />to replace native fishes with exotic species (Minckley and Deacon, <br />1968). <br />