Laserfiche WebLink
<br />206 <br /> <br />The Southwestern Naturalist <br /> <br />vol. 49, no. 2 <br /> <br />TABLE I-Ages (years) of Colorado pikeminnow <br />(Ptychocheilus lucius) estimated from scales, sectioned <br />otoliths (s), whole otoliths (w), and vertebrae re- <br />moved from each of 8 fish from the Green River <br />basin, Colorado and Utah. <br />Fish Total Verte- Otolith Otolith <br />num- length bral (s) (w) Scale <br />ber (mm) age age age age <br />1 324 5 5 5 5 <br />2 445 4 5 5 6 <br />3 453 5 4 6 7 <br />4 471 7 5 6 5 <br />5 478 8 7 7 6 <br />6 492 5 6 8 6 <br />7 518 8 9 5 6 <br />8 602 10 10 10 7 <br /> <br />between ages estimated from vertebrae and <br />whole otoliths (iI = 0.368; n = 9) or between <br />vertebral and scale estimates (iI = 0.417; n = <br />22). A final analysis produced low correlation <br />between the 2 otolith techniques (iI = 0.399; <br />n = 10). <br />We found similar relationships in 8 fish (es- <br />timated ages 5 to 10 years) from which all 4 <br />structures could be evaluated (i.e., scales, ver- <br />tebrae, and 2 otoliths; Table 1). Ages obtained <br />from reading sectioned otoliths were in close <br />agreement with vertebral estimates, having av- <br />erage discrepancies of less than ::t 1 year. In ad- <br />dition, the variance of TL explained with ver- <br />tebrae and sectioned otoliths ages differed by <br />only 12%. Ages estimated from whole otoliths <br />and scales showed less agreement with verte- <br />bral ages, and ages obtained by 2 otolith meth- <br />ods differed as much as 4 years. <br />First 5 years of growth were detected in read- <br />ing whole otoliths from 13 hatchery-reared fish <br />(ages 0, 1,2,4, and 5 years). The otoliths had <br />appropriate numbers of annuli, marked by <br />slow growth (closely-spaced circuli) in winter <br />and faster addition of bone (wider-spaced cir- <br />culi) in summer. Annuli were present in fish <br />older than their first winter of life and were <br />similar to putative annuli of wild-caught indi- <br />viduals. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION-Previous attempts to age adult <br />Colorado pikeminnow have been made with <br />scales, but in our study, fish age was underes- <br />timated when using scales compared to verte- <br />bral estimates from older fish. Although scales <br /> <br />are typically used for aging fishes that have <br />them (Jearld, 1983; Carlander, 1987), it has <br />been demonstrated repeatedly that the scale <br />method has limitations. Scales do not form for <br />some period of time in young fish (Carlander, <br />1982), they can be subject to peripheral ero- <br />sion, and annuli might not be produced or <br />might be too impacted to read in older fish <br />(Soupir et aI., 1997; GiIlanders et aI., 1999), all <br />of which increase reader bias (Boehlert and <br />Yoklavich, 1984; Kimura & Lyons, 1991). Sim- <br />ilarly, a previous Colorado pikeminnow scale <br />study reported the first annulus was often ab- <br />sent, the first 3 or 4 annuli were difficult to <br />distinguish, false checks and eroded scales oc- <br />curred, and 25% of scales were regenerated <br />(Hawkins, 1992). <br />We were not able to retrieve and age scales, <br />vertebrae, and 2 otoliths from each fish used <br />in this study because of restrictions imposed by <br />agencies, and problems with retrieving and <br />processing otoliths. However, we were able to <br />compare ages estimated with 4 structures taken <br />from 8 individuals. Results from aging these <br />fish supported our findings that ages obtained <br />from vertebrae and otolith sections were <br />strongly correlated and seemed to provide un- <br />biased estimates of TL. <br />Our presumption that TL would be a rea- <br />sonable estimator for growth of Colorado pi- <br />keminnow would be suspect without further <br />justification. Vanicek (1967) and Vanicek and <br />Kramer (1969) reported a steady increase in <br />mean TL and weight with increasing annual <br />age of Colorado pikeminnow (n = 182). Haw- <br />kins (1992) demonstrated a close relationship <br />between Colorado pikeminnow age and TL for <br />all of the fish captured in the Yampa River (n <br />= 148) and Green River (n = 116), and for <br />fish ages to 10 years in the Colorado River (n <br />= 14) and White River (n = 48). Osmundson <br />et aI. (1997) reported continued Colorado pi- <br />keminnow growth in TL for even the largest <br />(oldest) fish they captured (i.e., 800 to 899 <br />mm; ages> 32 years, n = 8). Thus, we consider <br />our use of TL as an estimator of Colorado pi- <br />keminnow growth was appropriate. <br />Our finding that vertebral centra are just as <br />useful for aging Colorado pikeminnow as sec- <br />tioned otoliths has important implications, be- <br />cause vertebrae are relatively large, sturdy, and <br />easy to age. In comparing historic fish remains, <br />otoliths would be more easily lost from skele- <br /> <br />'" <br />