My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8137
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8137
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:08:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8137
Author
Harvey, M. D., R. A. Mussetter and E. J. Wick.
Title
A Physical Process-biological Response Model for Spawning Habitat Formation for the Endangered Colorado Squawfish.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />SCALE <br />'N <br />MILES <br />-- ,,-=~ <br /> <br />* RIVER MILE <br />.5 <br /> <br />SCALE IN M1LES <br />0=510 <br /> <br />FIGURE 2. General and detailed location maps <br />for the study reaches of the Yampa River, Colorado. <br /> <br />tIe Snake River confluence to Echo Park at <br />the Green River confluence, a distance of <br />about 45 river miles. <br />A multidisciplinary study of spawning- <br />habitat formation for the Colorado squaw- <br />fish was conducted by a team of biologists, <br />hydrologists, geomorphologists, and en- <br />gineers in July 1991 at two known Colo- <br />rado squaw fish spawning sites at RM 16.5 <br />(Cleopatra's Couch spawning bar) and RM <br />18.5 (Alternate spawning bar) on the Yam- <br />pa River within Dinosaur National Mon- <br />ument (Figure 2). Both spawning sites are <br />coarse-grained midchannel bars that are <br />located in bedrock-bounded canyon sec- <br />tions of the river. Tyus (1992) has argued <br />that identification of the requirements and <br />needs of endangered fish species should <br />be carried out in the least physicochemi- <br />cally altered river systems, where it is as- <br />sumed the fish occupy optimum habitat. <br />The Yampa River fits these criteria both in <br />terms of the minimal degree of flow pat- <br />tern alteration (Tyus and Karp 1989) and <br />the persistence of endangered species (Tyus <br />and Karp 1989; Tyus 1990, 1992). <br /> <br />Hydrology <br /> <br />Correlation of the short period of Deer- <br />lodge Park gage record with the longer <br /> <br />period of Little Snake River at Lily and <br />Yampa River at Maybell gage records en- <br />abled a 70-yr record to be synthesized for <br />the canyon section (Resource Consultants <br />Inc., unpublished report). Average annual <br />discharge is about 2,100 cfs, and the mean <br />flow during the spring runoff (April-July) <br />is about 5,400 cfs. Monthly base flow av- <br />erages 500 cfs from August to March. The <br />flood of record occurred in May 1984 and <br />had a peak discharge of about 33,200 cfs. <br />Analysis of daily flow data for the period <br />of record enabled representative dry (1931, <br />1955, 1961),average(1941, 1951, 1956), and <br />wet (1932, 1962, 1979) conditions to be <br />identified. At Deerlodge Park, represen- <br />tative peak daily flows for dry, average, <br />and wet years are 7,000 cfs, 11,000 cfs, and <br />13,500 cfs. <br /> <br />Sediment Supply <br /> <br />Elliott et a!. (1984) concluded that the <br />majority of the approximately 2 million <br />tons per year of sediment transported <br />through the Yampa Canyon was derived <br />from upstream, and that the Little Snake <br />River was a major source of sand. Wash <br />load comprises about 35% of the total sed- <br />iment load, and the effective discharge, de- <br />fined as the increment of discharge that <br />transports the largest fraction of the an- <br />nual sediment load over a period of years, <br />is about 10,100 cfs (Andrews 1978). Field <br />observations within Yampa Canyon indi- <br />cated that local tributary delivery to the <br />Yampa River by summer thunderstorm- <br />generated debris flows of very coarse cob- <br />ble-to-boulder-sized sediment is important <br />in forming local hydraulic contraction and <br />expansion zones. Such zones have a marked <br />effect on the locations of sediment-storage <br />zones within the canyon. Locally derived <br />sandstone 'and limestone clasts comprise <br />the bulk of the coarsest sediments that form <br />both midchannel and bank-attached bars <br />within the reach (Berry 1985). <br /> <br />Channel Morphology <br /> <br />The upper 25 mi of the Yampa Canyon <br />(RM 20-45) are bounded by the Morgan <br />Formation, which is comprised of in- <br />terbedded limestones, shales, and sand- <br />stones (Steele et a!., unpublished report). <br />The canyon is relatively wide and asym- <br /> <br />I M. D. Harvey et a1. <br /> <br />U711~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.