Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />- . <br /> <br />.3.0 <br /> <br />r.T-c------~.-r <br />! <br /> <br />,--.. <br />p' <br />....., <br /> <br />~ 2.5- <br />~ <br />t5 <br />~ <br />:I <br />(j) <br />Z <br />~ <br />(9 <br />~ <br />W <br />....J <br />Z <br />o <br />(j) <br />z <br />w <br />~ <br />15 <br /> <br />2.0 <br /> <br />1.5 <br /> <br />1.0 <br /> <br />I: I <br />" . I I <br />i ! i <br />NO fI,'CJfloN i i <br />" ,I --l <br />--- .T..----.-+..-----r-~.. r-----~-_.__.-.. <br />. i I i I <br />I. .' I. I' I <br />' , I I <br />I i I I <br />.----+---+--+ - I <br />5 1000 <br /> <br />0.5 <br /> <br />0.0 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />2 <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />1 <br />i <br />\ <br />5 <br /> <br />I I <br />I I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />10000 <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />1 <br />3 <br /> <br />DISCHARGE (ds) <br /> <br />FIGURE 11. Variation in dimensionless grain shear stress (r:) at cross section 2.7 for two values of <br />dimensionless critical shear stress (T.) at discharges ranging from 500 to 10,000 cis in the right branch <br />channel, RM 16.5, Yampa River. The median size of the bed material is 68 mm (2.7 in.). <br /> <br />the time of the field visit in 1991, the bed <br />material was observed to be mobile only <br />at the tertiary bar at cross section 1.5 (Fig- <br />ure 3) and the hydraulic analysis indicated <br />that the bed material should have been mo- <br /> <br />bile (7*' > 1.0) at a discharge of about 1,200 <br />cfs. Because of raft access problems no at- <br />tempt was made to ascertain the presence <br />of Colorado squaw fish at the associated <br />pool. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Colorado squaw fish spawn at a limited <br />number of sites in the lower Yampa Can- <br />yon on the recessional limb of the annual <br />snowmelt hydrograph when the water <br />temperature exceeds about 190C (Figure 1) <br />(Wick et al. 1983; Tyus and Karp 1989; Tyus <br />1990). Based on fish-catch data, the phys- <br />ical requirements for successful spawning <br />are: (1) a relatively coarse-grained mid- <br />channel bar with an associated pool or <br />shoreline eddy for the resting-staging <br />phase (Wick et al. 1983), and (2) a clean <br />cobble substrate to permit adhesion of the <br />eggs during the deposition-fertilization <br />phase (Patten and Rodman 1969; Hamman <br />1981) . <br />The midchannel bar at RM 16.5 has <br />formed upstream of a sharp bend in the <br />bedrock-incised meandering channel. Un- <br />der higher discharges, the bend causes <br />backwater that flattens the energy gradient <br /> <br />(Figures 7 and 8). The lesser energy gra- <br />dient in turn reduces the ability of the flows <br />to transport gravels and cobbles that were <br />entrained farther upstream in reaches that <br />are unaffected by backwater. The behavior <br />of the midchannel bar is similar to that of <br />a riffle in a pool-riffle sequence. During <br />high flows, velocity is greater in the pools <br />and lower in the riffles, resulting in ero- <br />sion of previously stored sediments in the <br />pool and deposition of sediment in the rif- <br />fle. Under low flows, the velocity and sed- <br />iment transport capacity of the flows are <br />reversed-the pools become depositional <br />sites and the previously deposited sedi- <br />ments on the riffles are eroded (Keller 1971; <br />Lisle 1979). Scour of sand from the pools <br />during high flows and redeposition during <br />recessional flows were observed by O'Brien <br />(1984) in the lower Yampa Canyon. Hy- <br />draulic modeling of the RM 16.5 reach <br /> <br />I M. D. Harvey et al. <br /> <br />125 II~ <br />