Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br /> <br />I YY3 ~OJ0~y i ~{.Q\. <br /> <br />?137 <br /> <br />@ 1993 by S.E.L & Associates <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A Physical Process-biological Response <br />Model for Spawning Habitat Formation for the <br />Endangered Colorado Squawfish <br /> <br />Michael D. Harvey <br />Robert A. Mussetter <br />Resource Consultants & Engineers, Inc. <br />p.o. Box 270460 <br />Fort Collins, Colorado 80527 <br /> <br />Edmund J. Wick <br />National Park Service <br />1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 <br />Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 <br /> <br />ABSTRACT: The Colorado squawfish (PtychocheiLus Lucius), a federally listed <br />endangered species, spawns at a limited number of sites within the lower Yampa <br />River, Colorado, during the recessional limb of the annual snowmelt hydro- <br />graph. A three-level, physical process-biological response model for spawning <br />habitat formation was developed from field measurements, hydraulic modeling <br />(HEC-2), and analysis of a known spawning bar at River Mile (RM) 16.5. Sed- <br />iment deposition and bar formation occur at discharges greater than 10,000 cfs, <br />a discharge at which downstream hydraulic controls cause backwater and re- <br />duced transport capacity of the flows. Spawning habitat is formed by bar dis- <br />section and erosion at a range of flows between 400 and 5,000 cfs when the local <br />hydraulic energy is greatest because of reduced tailwater downstream, and sed- <br />iment delivery to the chute channels is reduced by deposition in an upstream <br />pool. The process-response model appears to be validated by fish-capture data <br />at this, and another spawning bar at RM 18.5, on the Yampa River during both <br />the 1991 and 1992 runoff seasons. <br /> <br />KEY WORDS: Colorado River basin, endangered species, hydraulic modeling, <br />sediment flushing. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />HistoriCallY the native cyprinids (Col- effects of habitat loss, regulation of flows, <br />orado squawfish, humpback chub, proliferation of introduced competitors and <br />bony tail chub, roundtail chub) and catos- predators, and other man-induced distur- <br />tomids (razorback sucker, flannel mouth bances (Tyus and Karp 1989; Tyus 1992). <br />sucker) were the dominant fishes in main- As a result, all of the named fishes have <br />stream habitats of the Colorado River basin been designated as federally listed endan- <br />and they were widely distributed and com- gered species. Recent proposals by the U.s. <br />mon to abundant in major rivers of the Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to des- <br />basin (Tyus 1986; Tyus and Karp 1989). ignate critical habitat for most of the Col- <br />However, with the exception of the round- orado River basin upstream of Lake Powell <br />tail chub and flannelmouth sucker, all of have highlighted the need to develop sci- <br />the above-named species are now threat- entifically defensible criteria for identify- <br />ened with extinction due to the combined ing habitats for various life stages and de- <br /> <br />I~ 114 <br /> <br />Rivers . Volume 4, Number 2 <br /> <br />Pages 114-131 <br />