Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. . <br /> <br />Although more fish were collected in Stratum X than other <br />strata (Figure 2), electrofishing data (more effective for larger <br />fish) indicated the upper two strata (V and W) supported greater <br />numbers of large native species, including flannelmouth and blue- <br />head suckers (Catostomus discobolis), and roundtail chubs (Gila <br />robusta). Catch per effort data for seines generally reflected <br />an abundance of the smaller species or young fish of larger species <br />and generally support the total numbers data. <br /> <br />Adult fish were collected primarily from shoreline habitat, <br />while backwaters contained the largest number of young fish (Figure <br />3).. The relative abundance of individual species (catCh/effort) <br />varied with life history stage and strata, reflecting the habitat <br />preference and availability to fishes in each strata. <br /> <br />In comparing the abundance of native and exotic fish species, <br />Strata V, W, and X supported higher percentages of native species <br />(87%, 90% and 69%, respectively). Although the explanation for this <br />is unknown, this could result from habitat differences favoring the <br />adaptations of native species over those of the exotics. <br /> <br />A total of 58 Colorado sQuawfish were collected in all samples, <br />1980-81, of which 39 (2 recaptures) were adults (408 mm + TL) and <br />18 were juveniles (116-400 mm TL). Colorado sQuawfish were collected <br />from all strata (V=l, W=5, x=8, Y=ll, Z=33). <br /> <br />Adult Colorado squawfish were primarily collected from eddy <br />(40%) and shoreline (28%) habitat. Substrate at point of collection <br />was dominated by sand (55%) and silt (22.5%). Juveniles were found <br />in slower moving waters, mainly from backwaters or eddies. <br /> <br />Larval samples were collected in each stratum from 22 to 29 <br />July, 1981. Although these samples have not been completely analyzed, <br />no Colorado sQuawfish.;Larvae were identified (Snyder 1982). The <br />significance of these results are unknown and should be related to <br />the low flow conditions in the White River in 1981 and the existence <br />of a possible drift mechanism for larvae (Miller et al. 1982.). <br /> <br />% <br /> <br />~~~ <br /> <br />In 1980, we reported the movement of a radiotelemetered <br />Colorado sQuawfish between the Green and White rivers (Tyus et al. <br />1981 A). Nine adult Colorado sQuawfish were captured in the White <br />River in 1981 and implanted with radiotransmitters. Although <br />contact was difficult to maintain, two fish were monitored for <br />4 and 5 months, respectively. One was relatively sedentary and <br />the other highly mobile. The mobile fish moved from the White River <br />into the lower Green River and returned back into the White, travel- <br />ing 611 km from 29 May to 7 October when contact was lost. <br /> <br />..: <br />:'t, <br /> <br />The occurrence of fishes found in this study was generally <br />similar to those reported by other investigators (Lanigan and Berry <br />1981, Crosby 1975, Prewitt et al. 1977, and Wick 1981). The number <br /> <br />46 <br /> <br />-~ <br />