<br />northeastern Utah was identified as one area needing
<br />further study. The middle Green River provides sensi-
<br />tive habitats for four endangered fish species, Colorado
<br />squawfish (Ptychocheilus Lucius), razorback sucker
<br />(Xyrauchen texanus), bonytail (Gila elegans), and hump-
<br />back chub (Gila cypha). The major causes for the
<br />decline of endangered fishes in the upper Colorado
<br />River basin include physical and water quality factors
<br />such as dams, which reduce water temperature, de-
<br />crease turbidity, alter seasonal and annual flow pat-
<br />terns, and reduce habitat for adult and larval stages of
<br />fish such as spawning bars and flooded bottomlands
<br />(U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1987). The middle
<br />Green River is defined as the drainage area consisting
<br />of the Green River and its tributaries between Flaming
<br />Gorge Dam and the City of Green River, Utah (Fig. 1).
<br />A DOl irrigation project near Jensen, Utah, returns
<br />water to the Stewart Lake Waterfowl Management
<br />Area and the Green River. Extensive irrigation outside
<br />the DOl project influences water quality in Ashley
<br />Creek and the Duchesne River, tributaries of the Green
<br />River downstream from Stewart Lake. Also down-
<br />stream, the Ouray NWR uses surface and groundwater
<br />for irrigation. Analysis of water, bottom sediment, and
<br />biological tissue collected from the middle Green River
<br />basin in the Ashley Creek-Stewart Lake area and at
<br />Ouray NWR since 1986 have confirmed the presence
<br />of boron, selenium, and zinc at concentrations that
<br />could be potentially harmful to fish and wildlife
<br />(Stephens et a!., 1988; 1992; Peltz and Waddell, 1991).
<br />Previous research has shown that selenium and other
<br />inorganics were acutely toxic to Colorado squawfish,
<br />razorback sucker, and bony tail at concentrations close
<br />to those in certain habitats in the middle Green River
<br />and in the San Juan River of New Mexico (Hamilton,
<br />1995; Buhl and Hamilton, 1996; Buhl, 1997; Hamilton
<br />and Buhl, 1997a; 1997b). Acute toxicity tests with envi-
<br />ronmental mixtures of inorganics simulating conditions
<br />at Stewart Lake and Ashley Creek in reconstituted
<br />Green River water and at several locations on the San
<br />Juan River in reconstituted river water showed high
<br />hazards for larval endangered fish. In a review of
<br />potential effects of selenium on endangered fish in the
<br />Colorado River basin, Hamilton (1998) concluded that
<br />selenium was. a contributing factor to the decline of
<br />endangered fish. A recent assessment of selenium con-
<br />centrations in wild larval stages of razorback sucker
<br />from the middle Green River showed that selenium
<br />was elevated in larvae from the Ashley Creek-Stewart
<br />Lake area (Hamilton et a!., 1998).
<br />Chronic toxicity studies were conducted with endan-
<br />gered larval razorback sucker and bony tail to deter-
<br />mine the influence of an inorganic mixture of elements
<br />derived from irrigation return flows entering the Green
<br />River from Ashley Creek.
<br />
<br />SIMULATING IRRIGATION WATER TOXICITY 49
<br />
<br />MATERIALS AND METHODS
<br />
<br />Razorback sucker and bonytail were acquired as eggs
<br />from Dexter National Fish Hatchery (NFH), New Mex-
<br />ico. The brood stock for razorback sucker and bonytail
<br />were adults from Lake Mohave, Arizona-Nevada. Eggs
<br />were acclimated to well water at Yankton, South
<br />Dakota, and hatched in a heath fish egg incubator.
<br />After hatching, larvae were held in a 46 L aquarium in
<br />well water and fed live nauplii of brine shrimp (Artemia
<br />spJ and a commercial salmon diet (Biodiet, BioProd-
<br />ucts, Inc.) ad libitum. Water characteristics of well
<br />water were hardness 930-1020 mg/L as CaC03, alka-
<br />linity 247-270 mg/L as CaC03, and pH 7.7-7.8.
<br />
<br />Experimental Design, Exposure Water
<br />and System
<br />
<br />Partial life-cycle chronic toxicity studies were con-
<br />ducted by exposing larvae to constant concentrations of
<br />a waterborne mixture of inorganics for 90 days in a
<br />flow-through proportional diluter system (Mount and
<br />Brungs, 1967). The diluter delivered 1 L of reconsti-
<br />tuted water to each exposure <\.quarium every 15 min.
<br />Nominal exposure concentrations were OX, IX, 2X, 4X,
<br />8X, and 16X, where IX represented the environmental
<br />mixture measured at the mouth of Ashley Creek on
<br />08/27/86 (Stephens et a!., 1988).
<br />Exposures were conducted in reconstituted water
<br />simulating the average environmental concentrations
<br />of cations and anions, minus trace elements, in the
<br />middle Green River at the Jensen gaging station of the
<br />U.S. Geological Survey (46 mg/L calcium, 20 mg/L
<br />magnesium, 49 mg/L sodium, 159 mg/L sulfate, 23
<br />mg/L chloride, and 130 mg/L bicarbonate) (ReMil-
<br />lard et a!., 1989). This reconstituted water was prepared
<br />by mixing high-purity water from a softener-reverse
<br />osmosis-de ionization system of water treatment with
<br />four salts (calcium chloride, calcium sulfate dihydrate,
<br />magnesium sulfate heptahydrate, and sodium bicarbon-
<br />ate). The salts were dissolved and" mixed in 5700 L
<br />polyethylene storage tanks equipped with mixing pumps
<br />and a repressurization system (Hamilton et a!., 1989).
<br />Water quality characteristics were measured weekly
<br />according to standard methods (American Public
<br />Health Association et a!., 1992) (Table I). The photope-
<br />riod was controlled by a timed, artificial lighting system
<br />(Drummond and Dawson, 1970) and simulated condi-
<br />tions in the middle Green River basin during March to
<br />July 1986. Oxygen concentrations in exposure water
<br />were supplemented by passing compressed air from an
<br />oil-less air compressor through air stones.
<br />Exposures were conducted in 46 L replicate aquaria
<br />divided by partitions into one 23 L residue chamber
<br />and two 11.5 L growth chambers. Residue chambers
<br />
|