Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Hamilton <br /> <br />and Drake, 1989) and warrant further work, as selenium may inhibit egg <br />production in [Colorado] squawfish [pikeminnow] and other native fishes of <br />the Colorado River." <br />A NIWQP investigation in the lower Colorado River including II locations <br />between Davis Dam and the U.S.-Mexico international border in 1986 to 1987 <br />revealed elevated selenium concentrations in water, sediment. and biota <br />(Radtke, Kepner, and Effertz, 1988). Radtke et at. (1988) also summarized <br />selenium concentrations in samples from five U.S. Geological SUf\'ev stations <br />monitored as part of the National Stream Quality Accounting :--.ietwork be- <br />tween 1975 and 1987. They reported that the maximum selenium concentra- <br />tion was 8 Ilg/L and the median was 3 Ilg/L in the lower Colorado River. <br />Median concentration in the Gila River above diversions at Gillespie Dam was <br />51lg/L (maximum 14 Ilg/L) , and near the mouth nearYuma. AZ. was 7,ug/L <br />(maXimum 16 Ilg/L). <br />Other studies in the lower Colorado River basin have concluded that <br />selenium contamination of water, sediment, and biota has occurred, and that <br />the contamination seems to be from the upper Colorado River basin (Andrews. <br />King, and Baker, 1997; Bell-McCaulou, 1993; King et at., 1993; Lusk, 1993: <br />Martinez, 1994; Radtke and Kepner, 1990; Ruiz, 1994: Rusk, 1991: \-Velsh. <br />1992; Welsh and Maughan, 1994). Each of these studies showed that. although <br />river concentrations of selenium were low, concentrations in river backwater <br />areas were elevated and contributing to the exposure of aquatic organisms. <br />Anderson et at. (1961) predicted that "the use of seleniferous waters down- <br />stream by other irrigation projects may create additional seleniferous agricul- <br />tural areas." This prediction apparently has been realized in the form of <br />seleniferous backwater areas in the lower Colorado River basin that were <br />derived from the disposal of seleniferous drain waters in the upper Colorado <br />River basin. <br />In the NIWQP studies of25 areas in the 15 Western states, the middle Green <br />River ranked 3rd for the highest median water concentration of selenium. 1 st <br />for sediment, 1st for fish, and 14th for birds (Engberg, 1998). The Gunnison <br />River basin/Grand Valley ranked 4th for the highest median water concentra- <br />tion of selenium, 2nd for sediment, 7th for fish, and 1st for birds. .\lthough the <br />lower Colorado River VaHey had low selenium in water, it was ranked -I:th for <br />sediments and 4th for fish (Engberg, 1998), due to selenium loading from the <br />upper Colorado River basin (Engberg, 1999). <br />These NIWQP, university, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service studies of <br />selenium contamination of the upper and lower Colorado River basins have <br />been reviewed in the context of their importance to endangered fish in <br />Hamilton (1998). He concluded that, based on current studies, selenium was <br />adversely affecting endangered fish in the Colorado River. <br /> <br />SELENIUM STUDIES WITH ENDANGERED FISH <br /> <br />The Colorado River Fishery Project, a component of the Recoven Imple- <br />mentation Program for the Endangered Fish Species of the Upper Colorado <br /> <br />1164 <br /> <br />Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Vol. 5. \:0. 6. 1999 <br />