Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OF WASHINGTON, VOLUME 50, NUMBER 2, JULY 1983 ' <br /> <br />207 <br /> <br />\. <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />L'!.J ,oCJ l.J <br />SCALE: FEET <br /> <br />-"- <br /> <br />, <br />ell a <br />~ ~ <br />~ ~ <br />~I~ <br />~i~ <br /> <br />Figure 1. Map of Belews Lake showing main collecting sites in ambient (M 1) and thermally <br />altered (HA 1) areas. <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />collected from the ambient (M 1) and thermally altered (HA 1) areas of the lake <br />(Fig. 1), Each sample was comprised of 60 mosquitofish, with 20 fish in each of <br />three arbitrarily established size classes (:::; 30 mm, 31-40 mm, and::::: 41 mm). <br />The fish were transported to the laboratory, where they were weighed, measured <br />for total and standard lengths, sexed, and necropsied with the aid of a binocular <br />dissecting microscope. During necropsy, the numbers of worms were counted. <br />In order to estimate the prevalence and density of B, acheilognathi in the natural <br />population of mosquitofish, the following computations were made, The per- <br />centage of a randomly collected sample (N = 60) of fish in each of the three size <br />classes was determined for each monthly collection (these fish represented a col- <br />lection different from the fish examined for parasites), This percentage was mul- <br />tiplied by the mean density or prevalence of the parasite in the size class, By <br />summing the results for all three size classes, and repeating the procedure for each <br />monthly sample at each collecting site, an estimate ofthe overall prevalence and <br />density of the parasite in the natural population of mosquito fish was determined. <br />Estimates of prevalence and density were computed because there was no a priori <br />indication that the entire Belews Lake mosquito fish population consisted equally <br />of individuals in each of the three size classes, or that prevalence and density are <br />the same in all size classes all year long, <br />Recruitment of B. acheilognathi byG, affinis was monitored monthly from <br />March 1980 through February 1982. Plankton were collected monthly in the <br />littoral zone at sites M 1 and HA 1 with several (20-30) horizontal tows ofa #20- <br />mesh Wisconsin plankton net. The plankton were returned live to the laboratory, <br />where they were placed into 4-liter aquaria containing uninfected G, affinis; water <br />temperatures were maintained at 220C. Four days after the fish were exposed to <br />