Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6 <br /> <br />DYNAMICS OF LIGHTLY EXPLOITED CHANNEL CATFISH <br /> <br />203 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />g 4 <br />>- <br />lJ <br />lii 3 <br />:l <br />tT <br />Ql <br />Il: 2 <br /> <br />4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 <br />Age <br /> <br />FIGURE 3. -Catch curve for 599 channel catfish caught <br />in the Powder River system during 1987 (in = log,,). <br /> <br />were returned in 1987,6 in 1988, and 1 in 1989; <br />of 740 tagged in 1988, 10 were returned in 1988, <br />and 5 in 1989. Using fish for which tags were <br />returned within 1 year of their initial capture, we <br />estimated annual fishing mortality to be 1.9% for <br />fish marked in 1987 and 2.0% for fish marked in <br />1988, but this is considered a conservative esti- <br />mate because we did not adjust for tag loss or <br />nonreturn of tags by anglers. <br />Yield estimates based on the Ricker and <br />Thompson-Bell models (Figure 4) were similar. <br />When instantaneous natural mortality was held at <br />0.25, maximum yield was at instantaneous fishing <br />mortality rates of 0.20-0.25. These rates corre- <br />sponded to annual fishing mortalities of 18-22%. <br />For each level of exploitation, RSDs were com- <br /> <br />TABLE i.-Mean total lengths and mean weights of <br />channel catfish collected in the Powder River system <br />during 1987 (N = 599) and 1988 (N = 257). <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />Age Length (mm) Weight (kg) <br />(years) 1987 1988 1987 1988 <br />3 241 251 0.04 0.20 <br />4 265 307 0.07 0.23 <br />5 293 308 0.13 0.27 <br />6 339 342 0.32 0.40 <br />7 390 420 0.57 0.79 <br />8 440 435 0.89 0.93 <br />9 513 540 1.41 1.75 <br />10 580 572 2.12 2.07 <br />11 568 616 1.97 2.80 <br />12 595 653 2.28 3.04 <br />13 619 640 2.47 3.22 <br />14 619 666 2.39 3.33 <br />15 653 648 2.93 3.20 <br />16 643 677 2.70 3.53 <br />17 660 690 3.08 3.13 <br />18 638 690 2.80 3.54 <br />19+" 635 3.08 <br />"Age 19 years and older. <br /> <br />~ 3.0 <br />VI <br />:!:: 2.8 <br />~ 2.6 <br />l!! 2.4 <br />'0 2.2 <br />Cl 2.0 <br />~1.8 <br />g 1.6 <br />!:: 1.4 <br />g 1.2 <br />~ 1.0 <br />)( 0.8 <br />~ 0.6 <br />:; 0,4 <br />G) 0,2 <br />:;: 0 <br /> <br />Ul 2S:0 <br />'5 2EO <br />~ 240 <br />l!! 220 <br />iii 200 <br />.s 180 <br />i 160 <br />-g 140 <br />;; 120 <br />~ 100 <br />~ 80 <br />~ 60 <br />il 4'0 <br />:;: 210 <br />I~ <br /> <br />Ricker <br /> <br /> <br />Thompson-Bell <br /> <br /> <br />0.01 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 <br />Instantaneous Rate of Fishing <br /> <br />FIGURE 4.- Yield estimates for channel catfish in the <br />Powder River system derived from the Ricker and <br />Thompson-Bell models. To obtain the actual biomass <br />per 1,000 kg of recruits with the Ricker model, multiply <br />depicted number by 1,000. <br /> <br />puted (Table 2). In addition to decreasing overall <br />abundance, a shift toward smaller size-classes was <br />indicated as exploitation increased. As the instan- <br />taneous rate of fishing mortality increased from <br />0.01 to 0.25, the proportions of stock-size fish in <br />the preferred, memorable, and trophy sizes were <br />estimated to decline from 50 to 22%. This would <br /> <br />TABLE 2. -Computed relative stock densities for chan- <br />nel catfish in the Powder River at various levels of ex- <br />ploitation. <br /> Length category (length, cm) <br />Instanta- Pre- Memo- <br />neous rate Stock Quality ferred rab1e Trophy <br />of lishing (3~0) (41-50) (51-60) (61-70) (>70) <br />0.01 35 15 34 16 0 <br />0.05 45 15 29 11 0 <br />0.10 51 15 26 8 0 <br />0.15 55 15 24 6 0 <br />0.20 59 15 22 4 0 <br />0.25 64 14 19 3 0 <br />0.50 78 12 10 0 0 <br />