Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'. ,~ t <br /> <br />.l \,' ~_' :.J..--r ;0" ~;, ,:/,,,,(..;(",/\ <br /> <br />North American Journal of Fisheries Management 11:200-205, 1991 <br /> <br />,~ <br />"-" <br /> <br />Population Dynamics of a Lightly Exploited Channel Catfish <br />Stock in the Powder River System, Wyoming-Montana <br /> <br />""' <br /> <br />DAVID R. GERHARDT I AND WAYNE A. HUBERT <br /> <br />u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit2 <br />University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, USA <br /> <br />Abstract. - The population dynamics of a lightly exploited stock of channel catfish Ictalurus <br />punctatus were assessed in the Powder River system, Wyoming-Montana, with special emphasis <br />on evaluation of changes that may occur if the harvest is increased. The samples contained a <br />substantial proportion of large fish, but growth rate was similar to that in other areas at lower <br />elevations and latitudes. Fish up to 21 years old were collected. Annual exploitation was estimated <br />to be only 1.9-2.0%. Maximum yield was predicted to occur at 18-22% annual fishing mortality, <br />but this level of exploitation would be expected to cause a shift toward smaller sizes of fish and <br />virtually eliminate fish in the large size-classes (> 50 cm total length), which are the principal <br />attraction for the current anglers. <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />Western U.S. states are best known for their <br />coldwater fisheries, but warmwater fisheries are <br />becoming increasingly popular among anglers in <br />that region (Stewart 1988). As a result, more em- <br />phasis is being placed on the management of <br />warmwater species such as the channel catfish Ic- <br />talurus punctatus. Few data on channel catfish <br />populations are available to assist in developing <br />management alternatives. Smith and Hubert (1988) <br />identified a stock of channel catfish in the Powder <br />River drainage of northeastern Wyoming with rel- <br />atively high numbers of the large fish preferred by <br />anglers. This channel catfish stock thus provides <br />an attractive fishery that may require more inten- <br />sive management. <br />This study was designed to provide quantitative <br />information about the channel catfish stock in the <br />Powder River system. Of primary interest were <br />various aspects of population dynamics, including <br />age, growth, mortality, and potential yield. Be- <br />cause these channel catfish live at relatively high <br />elevation and latitude, the growing season is short- <br />er than that in many other areas where channel <br />catfish occur, and slow-growing fish were expected. <br />We had three objectives relative to the descrip- <br />tion of population dynamics of channel catfish in <br />the Powder River: (1) to assess population struc- <br />ture with respect to length and age of fish in the <br />stock, (2) to estimate annual mortality and ex- <br /> <br />1 Present address: U.S. Forest Service, Arapaho-Roo- <br />sevelt National Forest, 240 West Prospect Road, Fort <br />Collins, Colorado 80526, USA. <br />2 The Unit is supported by the University of Wyo- <br />ming, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, and U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service. <br /> <br />ploitation rates, and (3) to assess the influence of <br />increased exploitation on potential yield and pop- <br />ulation structure. <br /> <br />Study Area <br /> <br />The Powder River system provides a unique <br />opportunity to study channel catfish. It is in a <br />remote area of northeastern Wyoming and south- <br />eastern Montana, and has been relatively unaf- <br />fected by channelization, extensive water devel- <br />opment, high exploitation rates, or various human <br />impacts common to other waters where channel <br />catfish are native. The study area included the <br />Powder River and two tributaries, Crazy Woman <br />Creek and Clear Creek (Figure 1). The Powder <br />River drainage basin is 34,300 km2, and the drain- <br />age area within the study area (upstream from <br />Moorhead, Montana) is 20,948 km2, most of which <br />consists of semiarid plains grassland and sage- <br />brush shrubland. Annual evaporation exceeds pre- <br />cipitation in most ofthe basin (Hodson et al. 1973). <br />Elevation ranges from 770 m at the confluence of <br />the Powder River with the Yellowstone River in <br />Montana to 3,950 m at the Powder River head- <br />waters in the Bighorn Mountains of Wyoming. <br />In general, the Powder River is a low-gradient <br />stream with poorly developed riparian areas, high- <br />1y fluctuating flows, and unstable substrates. In- <br />tense storms in the headwaters during summer <br />often result in sudden increases in discharge. Tur- <br />bidity can exceed 500 Jackson turbidity units, and <br />total dIssolved solids sometimes exceed 1,300 mglL <br />(Smith and Hubert 1988). <br />In contrast, Crazy Woman Creek and Clear Creek <br />have well-developed riparian zones, confined <br />banks, stable substrates, and relatively low tur- <br /> <br />200 <br />