<br />'. ,~ t
<br />
<br />.l \,' ~_' :.J..--r ;0" ~;, ,:/,,,,(..;(",/\
<br />
<br />North American Journal of Fisheries Management 11:200-205, 1991
<br />
<br />,~
<br />"-"
<br />
<br />Population Dynamics of a Lightly Exploited Channel Catfish
<br />Stock in the Powder River System, Wyoming-Montana
<br />
<br />""'
<br />
<br />DAVID R. GERHARDT I AND WAYNE A. HUBERT
<br />
<br />u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit2
<br />University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, USA
<br />
<br />Abstract. - The population dynamics of a lightly exploited stock of channel catfish Ictalurus
<br />punctatus were assessed in the Powder River system, Wyoming-Montana, with special emphasis
<br />on evaluation of changes that may occur if the harvest is increased. The samples contained a
<br />substantial proportion of large fish, but growth rate was similar to that in other areas at lower
<br />elevations and latitudes. Fish up to 21 years old were collected. Annual exploitation was estimated
<br />to be only 1.9-2.0%. Maximum yield was predicted to occur at 18-22% annual fishing mortality,
<br />but this level of exploitation would be expected to cause a shift toward smaller sizes of fish and
<br />virtually eliminate fish in the large size-classes (> 50 cm total length), which are the principal
<br />attraction for the current anglers.
<br />
<br />l
<br />
<br />Western U.S. states are best known for their
<br />coldwater fisheries, but warmwater fisheries are
<br />becoming increasingly popular among anglers in
<br />that region (Stewart 1988). As a result, more em-
<br />phasis is being placed on the management of
<br />warmwater species such as the channel catfish Ic-
<br />talurus punctatus. Few data on channel catfish
<br />populations are available to assist in developing
<br />management alternatives. Smith and Hubert (1988)
<br />identified a stock of channel catfish in the Powder
<br />River drainage of northeastern Wyoming with rel-
<br />atively high numbers of the large fish preferred by
<br />anglers. This channel catfish stock thus provides
<br />an attractive fishery that may require more inten-
<br />sive management.
<br />This study was designed to provide quantitative
<br />information about the channel catfish stock in the
<br />Powder River system. Of primary interest were
<br />various aspects of population dynamics, including
<br />age, growth, mortality, and potential yield. Be-
<br />cause these channel catfish live at relatively high
<br />elevation and latitude, the growing season is short-
<br />er than that in many other areas where channel
<br />catfish occur, and slow-growing fish were expected.
<br />We had three objectives relative to the descrip-
<br />tion of population dynamics of channel catfish in
<br />the Powder River: (1) to assess population struc-
<br />ture with respect to length and age of fish in the
<br />stock, (2) to estimate annual mortality and ex-
<br />
<br />1 Present address: U.S. Forest Service, Arapaho-Roo-
<br />sevelt National Forest, 240 West Prospect Road, Fort
<br />Collins, Colorado 80526, USA.
<br />2 The Unit is supported by the University of Wyo-
<br />ming, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, and U.S.
<br />Fish and Wildlife Service.
<br />
<br />ploitation rates, and (3) to assess the influence of
<br />increased exploitation on potential yield and pop-
<br />ulation structure.
<br />
<br />Study Area
<br />
<br />The Powder River system provides a unique
<br />opportunity to study channel catfish. It is in a
<br />remote area of northeastern Wyoming and south-
<br />eastern Montana, and has been relatively unaf-
<br />fected by channelization, extensive water devel-
<br />opment, high exploitation rates, or various human
<br />impacts common to other waters where channel
<br />catfish are native. The study area included the
<br />Powder River and two tributaries, Crazy Woman
<br />Creek and Clear Creek (Figure 1). The Powder
<br />River drainage basin is 34,300 km2, and the drain-
<br />age area within the study area (upstream from
<br />Moorhead, Montana) is 20,948 km2, most of which
<br />consists of semiarid plains grassland and sage-
<br />brush shrubland. Annual evaporation exceeds pre-
<br />cipitation in most ofthe basin (Hodson et al. 1973).
<br />Elevation ranges from 770 m at the confluence of
<br />the Powder River with the Yellowstone River in
<br />Montana to 3,950 m at the Powder River head-
<br />waters in the Bighorn Mountains of Wyoming.
<br />In general, the Powder River is a low-gradient
<br />stream with poorly developed riparian areas, high-
<br />1y fluctuating flows, and unstable substrates. In-
<br />tense storms in the headwaters during summer
<br />often result in sudden increases in discharge. Tur-
<br />bidity can exceed 500 Jackson turbidity units, and
<br />total dIssolved solids sometimes exceed 1,300 mglL
<br />(Smith and Hubert 1988).
<br />In contrast, Crazy Woman Creek and Clear Creek
<br />have well-developed riparian zones, confined
<br />banks, stable substrates, and relatively low tur-
<br />
<br />200
<br />
|