Laserfiche WebLink
<br />\, <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Table 2.--Major categories of basin attributes <br />for the Green River drainage, the number of <br />variables originally within each category, and <br />some examples of independent variables from <br />each category. <br /> <br />Basin attribute <br />cate~orv <br />GEOLOGY <br /> <br />Number of <br />variables <br />51 <br /> <br />Examples <br />Glacial area <br />Tipton shale area <br />Area of Precamb- <br />rian rock <br />Soil pH <br />K factor <br />Hean minimum-temp <br />Area juniper <br />% area of juniper <br />Total range area <br />Bifurcation ratio <br />Total stream length <br />10 year flood cfs <br /> <br />SOILS 19 <br />CLIMATE ) <br />LAND COVER/LAND USE 75 <br />HYDROLOGY 16 <br />Number of variables 164 <br />Geology <br /> <br />We calculated areas of all geological forma- <br />tions shown on three hydrologic investigations maps <br />(Welder and HcGreevy 1966, Whitcomb and Lowry 1968, <br />and Welder 1968). The area of each formation in <br />each of 18 subbasins (see Dependent Variables) were <br />recorded and areas of geologically similar forma- <br />tions summed as independent variables. <br /> <br />Soils <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />From Young and Singleton (1977) we found which <br />soil series were represented in soil associations <br />in the watershed and the area of each association <br />in each subbasin. From corresponding soil series <br />data sheets supplied by Hunn (1984), we calculated <br />and weighted the characteristics of all soil series <br />within each association by area to obtain the sub- <br />basin values. <br /> <br />Climate <br /> <br />Haps from Lowers (1960) were enlarged and <br />minimum-maximum temperatures, weighted by area, <br />calculated for each subbasin. <br /> <br />Land Cover/Land Use <br /> <br />Anderson et al. (1984) complied a land cover <br />map of Wyoming from which we obtained values of cover, <br />weighted by area, for each subbasin. <br /> <br />Hydrology <br /> <br />Hydrological variables were estimated using <br />data taken from U.S" Geological Survey 1:250,000 <br />scale topographic maps of the basin. Areas were <br />obtained with the digitizer, and linear measures <br />. with a map measuring wheel. Transformations and <br />calculations were performed within Lotus spread- <br />sheet f nes. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Reduction of Number of Independent Variables <br /> <br />We reduced the number of independent variables <br />form the original 164 by first eliminating vari- <br />ables which were percentages or sums of other vari- <br />ables (except for Geological variables, where we <br />kept the sums and eliminated their co~ponents). We <br />make a further reduction in the number of variables <br />by dropping variables which were not significantly <br />related to a water quality variable (p=0.05) in a <br />simple bivariate regression. Thus, for every de- <br />pendent water .quality variable, we ha~ a unique set <br />of independent basin attributes for the multiple <br />regression analysis. <br /> <br />Dependent Variables <br /> <br />The Wyoming Water Research Center maintains a <br />copy of the U.S." Geological Survey's surface water <br />quality and discharge data for Wyoming. From this <br />we extracted all water quality data for all sampling <br />stations in the watershed. We selected stations <br />with the greatest number of acceptable water quality <br />parameters. A water quality parameeters was accept- <br />able if it had at least seven years of data between <br />water years 1965 (when Flaming Gorge Reservoir's dam <br />closed) and 1979, with at least one year of data <br />comprised of ten or more samples. Using,these cri- <br />teria, we found only eight water quality variables <br />for at each of eighteen stations. The areas above <br />these eighteen stations also defined the subbasins <br />for which we complied basin attribute values. <br /> <br />The concentration of many water quality para- <br />meters depends upon discharge (Lystrom, et al.). <br />For these parameters, mean loads should be calc- <br />ulated as the sum of instantaneous loads derived <br />from the concentration/discharge relationship. <br />For the parameters considered in this report [phos- <br />phorus (P), nitrate nitrogen (NO)), and total dis- <br />solved solids (TOS)], only TOS concentration showed <br />such a significant relation. We therefore used TDS <br />loads, and phosphorus and nitrate concentrations as <br />our dependent variables in the multiple regression <br />analyses. <br /> <br />Regression <br /> <br />Each of the three water quality parameters had <br />a unique set of associated independent variables. <br />A Pearson correlation analysis (Nie, et al. 1975) <br />was used to investigate intercorrelations among the <br />independent variables prior to the regression anal- <br />ysis. For the regression method we chose Hull and <br />Nie's (1981) stepwise NEW REGRESSION, with prob- <br />abilities of F-to-enter and I-to-remove at default <br />values of 0.05 and 0.10 respectively. All SPSS <br />analyses were conducted on a Control Data Corpora- <br />tion Cyber 760 computer. <br /> <br />Our interpretation of regression results to <br />find the "best" association of water quality with <br />basin attributes hinged on two objective criteria <br />and one somewhat philosophical principle. Our first <br />criterion was that a good regression equation <br />explains the most of the variance about the 2epen- <br />dint vuillbl. (i.... 1'1.. . hlahu aclju.hd R ). .~~. ., <br /> <br />, '--: <br /> <br />203 <br />