Laserfiche WebLink
<br />NEST-SPECIFIC BASS DNA FINGERPRINTS <br /> <br />457 <br /> <br />tion, thus increasing the probability of matings <br />between close relatives, It is not clear whether in- <br />breeding results from a species being philopatric <br />or philopatry evolved to facilitate inbreeding <br />(Shields 1982), <br />Our DNA fingerprinting data provide support <br />for the hypothesis that smallmouth bass in Lake <br />Opeongo are philopatric, resulting in some level <br />of inbreeding, Reeve et al. (1990) found that full <br />siblings of inbred colonies of naked mole-rats Hel- <br />erocephalus glaber had an average SI of95,O, and <br />Schartl et al. (1991) calculated a similar value for <br />a clonal fish, the amazon molly Poeciliaformosa, <br />Lehman et al. (1992), working with gray wolves <br />Canis lupus, found that full siblings with inbred <br />parents had an average SI of 78,7, On the other <br />hand, average SI values calculated for outbred full <br />siblings oflargemouth bass Microplerus salmoides <br />and threespine stickleback Gaslerosleus aculealus <br />were 66,0 (Whitmore et al. 1990) and 56,0 (Rico <br />et al. 1991), respectively. Therefore, the SI of87.2 <br />for full-sibling smallmouth bass in Lake Opeongo <br />probably represents an inbred population, <br />Limited evidence for inbreeding also comes from <br />comparisons of banding patterns between the male <br />and female mates in two pairs of smallmouth bass <br />captured while spawning, which had an average <br />SI value of69.5 (fingerprint data not shown), This <br />value is higher than the population SI value of <br />52,5, suggesting that these two spawning pairs were <br />inbreeding (rather than randomly mating) because <br />they are more closely related to each other than <br />to the population in general (the SI value increases <br />with increasing relatedness; Lynch 1988), More <br />extensive sampling of spawning pairs is needed to <br />confirm the generality of this finding for the Lake <br />Opeongo population. <br />Evidence of philopatry for the Lake Opeongo <br />smallmouth bass is supported by the higher av- <br />erage 51 value for fry from closely spaced nests <br />(67,2) than for fry from nests distributed through- <br />out Jones Bay (52.5), This results suggests that fry <br />from nests clustered together are more closely re- <br />lated to each other than are Jones Bay fry in gen- <br />eral. If nest site selection were random (no occur- <br />rence of philo patry), an SI value ofapproximately <br />52 would be expected for fry from closely spaced <br />nests, <br />Although philopatry has not been explicitly <br />demonstrated for small mouth bass, the species is <br />capable of homing (Larimore 1952) and adults <br />have high nest site fidelity (Ridgway et al. 1991). <br />Preliminary telemetry data for Lake Opeongo <br />smallmouth bass indicate that the fish set up sum- <br /> <br />mer home ranges that can be very distant (several <br />kilometers) from where they spawn (Mark Ridg- <br />way, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, per- <br />sonal communication), These observations sug- <br />gest that adult fish move throughout the lake and <br />are aware of other spawning sites, but still return <br />to their previous spawning area, <br />An additional explanation for the observed high <br />levels of homozygosity within nests, which form <br />the basis of the observed nest-specific DNA fin- <br />gerprints, may be that they are the result of a pop- <br />ulation bottleneck, a phenomenon that may have <br />occurred when smallmouth bass were initially <br />stocked into Lake Opeongo in the 1920s. A pop- <br />ulation bottleneck is defined as a severe temporary <br />reduction in population size (Hartl and Clark <br />1989), Population bottlenecks increase the ho- <br />mozygosity of a population because a dramatic <br />reduction in population size increases the likeli- <br />hood of inbreeding, In our opinion, such a bottle- <br />neck is an unlikely cause of the relatively high <br />homozygosities within nest cohorts. If a bottle- <br />neck had occurred, one would expect the popu- <br />lation as a whole to have increased homozygosity <br />and very similar DNA fingerprints among nest <br />cohorts, thus precluding nest-specific fingerprints. <br />In conclusion, we have observed an unexpected <br />pattern of nest-specific DNA fingerprints in one <br />lake population of smallmouth bass. The gener- <br />ality of this phenomenon for lake and river pop- <br />ulations of this species is currently unknown and <br />requires additional research. These results raise <br />intriguing questions about the roles of philopatry <br />and inbreeding in the life history strategy of this <br />Lake Opeongo population, Nest-specific DNA fin- <br />gerprints could become a powerful tool for man- <br />agement of fisheries populations in which they oc- <br />cur because they would allow monitoring of <br />individual reproductive success to any life stage, <br />This would make it possible to determine patterns <br />of temporal and spatial variability in individual <br />reproductive success and to elucidate roles of myr- <br />iad factors in control of reproductive success, Un- <br />derstanding these patterns and the factors that <br />drive them will help managers to improve harvest <br />regulation and direct habitat management so as to <br />prevent diminution of individual reproductive <br />success, <br /> <br />Acknowledgments <br /> <br />We thank the Ontario Ministry of Natural Re- <br />sources, particularly M. Ridgway, L. King, and the <br />staff at the Harkness Laboratory of Fisheries Re- <br />search, for help in collection of samples, We would <br />