<br />NEST-SPECIFIC BASS DNA FINGERPRINTS
<br />
<br />457
<br />
<br />tion, thus increasing the probability of matings
<br />between close relatives, It is not clear whether in-
<br />breeding results from a species being philopatric
<br />or philopatry evolved to facilitate inbreeding
<br />(Shields 1982),
<br />Our DNA fingerprinting data provide support
<br />for the hypothesis that smallmouth bass in Lake
<br />Opeongo are philopatric, resulting in some level
<br />of inbreeding, Reeve et al. (1990) found that full
<br />siblings of inbred colonies of naked mole-rats Hel-
<br />erocephalus glaber had an average SI of95,O, and
<br />Schartl et al. (1991) calculated a similar value for
<br />a clonal fish, the amazon molly Poeciliaformosa,
<br />Lehman et al. (1992), working with gray wolves
<br />Canis lupus, found that full siblings with inbred
<br />parents had an average SI of 78,7, On the other
<br />hand, average SI values calculated for outbred full
<br />siblings oflargemouth bass Microplerus salmoides
<br />and threespine stickleback Gaslerosleus aculealus
<br />were 66,0 (Whitmore et al. 1990) and 56,0 (Rico
<br />et al. 1991), respectively. Therefore, the SI of87.2
<br />for full-sibling smallmouth bass in Lake Opeongo
<br />probably represents an inbred population,
<br />Limited evidence for inbreeding also comes from
<br />comparisons of banding patterns between the male
<br />and female mates in two pairs of smallmouth bass
<br />captured while spawning, which had an average
<br />SI value of69.5 (fingerprint data not shown), This
<br />value is higher than the population SI value of
<br />52,5, suggesting that these two spawning pairs were
<br />inbreeding (rather than randomly mating) because
<br />they are more closely related to each other than
<br />to the population in general (the SI value increases
<br />with increasing relatedness; Lynch 1988), More
<br />extensive sampling of spawning pairs is needed to
<br />confirm the generality of this finding for the Lake
<br />Opeongo population.
<br />Evidence of philopatry for the Lake Opeongo
<br />smallmouth bass is supported by the higher av-
<br />erage 51 value for fry from closely spaced nests
<br />(67,2) than for fry from nests distributed through-
<br />out Jones Bay (52.5), This results suggests that fry
<br />from nests clustered together are more closely re-
<br />lated to each other than are Jones Bay fry in gen-
<br />eral. If nest site selection were random (no occur-
<br />rence of philo patry), an SI value ofapproximately
<br />52 would be expected for fry from closely spaced
<br />nests,
<br />Although philopatry has not been explicitly
<br />demonstrated for small mouth bass, the species is
<br />capable of homing (Larimore 1952) and adults
<br />have high nest site fidelity (Ridgway et al. 1991).
<br />Preliminary telemetry data for Lake Opeongo
<br />smallmouth bass indicate that the fish set up sum-
<br />
<br />mer home ranges that can be very distant (several
<br />kilometers) from where they spawn (Mark Ridg-
<br />way, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, per-
<br />sonal communication), These observations sug-
<br />gest that adult fish move throughout the lake and
<br />are aware of other spawning sites, but still return
<br />to their previous spawning area,
<br />An additional explanation for the observed high
<br />levels of homozygosity within nests, which form
<br />the basis of the observed nest-specific DNA fin-
<br />gerprints, may be that they are the result of a pop-
<br />ulation bottleneck, a phenomenon that may have
<br />occurred when smallmouth bass were initially
<br />stocked into Lake Opeongo in the 1920s. A pop-
<br />ulation bottleneck is defined as a severe temporary
<br />reduction in population size (Hartl and Clark
<br />1989), Population bottlenecks increase the ho-
<br />mozygosity of a population because a dramatic
<br />reduction in population size increases the likeli-
<br />hood of inbreeding, In our opinion, such a bottle-
<br />neck is an unlikely cause of the relatively high
<br />homozygosities within nest cohorts. If a bottle-
<br />neck had occurred, one would expect the popu-
<br />lation as a whole to have increased homozygosity
<br />and very similar DNA fingerprints among nest
<br />cohorts, thus precluding nest-specific fingerprints.
<br />In conclusion, we have observed an unexpected
<br />pattern of nest-specific DNA fingerprints in one
<br />lake population of smallmouth bass. The gener-
<br />ality of this phenomenon for lake and river pop-
<br />ulations of this species is currently unknown and
<br />requires additional research. These results raise
<br />intriguing questions about the roles of philopatry
<br />and inbreeding in the life history strategy of this
<br />Lake Opeongo population, Nest-specific DNA fin-
<br />gerprints could become a powerful tool for man-
<br />agement of fisheries populations in which they oc-
<br />cur because they would allow monitoring of
<br />individual reproductive success to any life stage,
<br />This would make it possible to determine patterns
<br />of temporal and spatial variability in individual
<br />reproductive success and to elucidate roles of myr-
<br />iad factors in control of reproductive success, Un-
<br />derstanding these patterns and the factors that
<br />drive them will help managers to improve harvest
<br />regulation and direct habitat management so as to
<br />prevent diminution of individual reproductive
<br />success,
<br />
<br />Acknowledgments
<br />
<br />We thank the Ontario Ministry of Natural Re-
<br />sources, particularly M. Ridgway, L. King, and the
<br />staff at the Harkness Laboratory of Fisheries Re-
<br />search, for help in collection of samples, We would
<br />
|