Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MODELING CUI-UI RECOVERY <br /> <br />practical; even if undisturbed by humans, popu- <br />lations eventually disappear. Natural alterations <br />occur in the environment; social values and pres- <br />sures change. A more practical approach is to con- <br />sider indefinite as a time span that reflects dimin- <br />ishing interest in more and more distant future <br />events by our present society. Conservation bi- <br />ologists are fond of thinking in terms of 1,000 <br />years. But when we stop to consider that 1,000 <br />years ago the Norman conquest was still three gen- <br />erations in the future, a millenium begins to seem <br />like a very long time. Thompson (1991) stated that <br />though no theoretical rationale supports a univer- <br />sal time period of persistence, consolation can be <br />derived from the frequency with which researchers <br />have used 100 years. This value, however, is too <br />short for cui-ui because it covers only 2.5 life spans. <br />A more reasonable and, in terms of a collective, <br />societal attention span, realistic time frame is two <br />centuries. This value is similar to the 250 years <br />considered for the northern spotted owl Strix oc- <br />cidentalis (Thomas et al. 1990). Accordingly, the <br />definition of indefinite in this report is taken to be <br />200 years. <br />There is never certainty that a population will <br />persist for 200 years. At what level of probability <br />are we to be satisfied that a species has recovered? <br />In keeping with standard statistical procedure for <br />distinguishing between a null hypothesis (extinc- <br />tion) and its alternative, we suggest 95% as an <br />acceptable level. Thompson (1991) suggested re- <br />liance on this percentage because of the numerous <br />researchers that have used similar values in the <br />past. <br /> <br />Models Used <br /> <br />As noted above, we believe the driving envi- <br />ronmental variable for cui.ui population dynam- <br />ics is availability of water. Even many secondary <br />factors, such as temperature effects on egg devel- <br />opment and survival, are controlled largely by wa- <br />ter supply. Accordingly, the model used to project <br />the cui-ui population is driven by river flow. That <br />is, it assumes that cui.ui reproduction and mor- <br />tality are mediated solely through hydrologic con- <br />ditions. This approach does not deny the possible <br />importance of other ecological factors (e.g., pre- <br />dation on larvae by other species). It merely re- <br />flects our belief in the overriding influence of lake <br />level and the efficacy of model simplicity. <br />Because cui-ui population dynamics depend on <br />hydrology, and because acquired water would be <br />only supplemental to the underlying hydrological <br />events, predictions of future fish population size <br /> <br />469 <br /> <br />must reflect future natural hydrologic scenarios. <br />These scenarios cannot be known with certainty. <br />Thus, it is necessary to rely on probabilistic pro- <br />jections. For such projections to be valid, two re- <br />quirements must be considered. <br />First, hydrologic sequences are likely to be au- <br />tocorrelated-that is, a wet year might more likely <br />be followed by another wet year than by a dry one <br />or vice versa. Of course, the correlation between <br />adjacent years might be positive and the correla- <br />tion between years t and t + 2 might be negative. <br />Any predicted future scenario must reflect such <br />autocorrelations. <br />Second, hydrologic events are correlated in space, <br />at least within a watershed. For example, snowfall <br />in the Truckee River watershed and water avail- <br />ability in Stampede Reservoir, a reservoir dedi- <br />cated to cui-ui in the Truckee River basin, affect <br />available flow in the lower Truckee River. Any <br />predicted future scenario must reflect these spatial <br />relations. <br />Information inherent in the above two require- <br />ments can be captured by describing the proba- <br />bility that a certain hydrological condition will <br />occur at some point, A, as a function of what is <br />happening at points B, C, etc., and what has hap- <br />pened at point A in previous years. Such a de- <br />scription is known as a conditional probability <br />density function. If we possessed such a density <br />function and if, in addition, we knew point A's <br />history and also the upcoming conditions at B, C, <br />etc., we would be able to predict the probability <br />of the upcoming condition at A. If we were to <br />obtain an expression that gave this probability for <br />all points A, B, C, etc., simultaneously (a multi- <br />variate conditional probability density function), <br />we would be able to predict simultaneously the <br />probability of any upcoming spatial configuration <br />of conditions over the various points. In fact, we <br />could do better than this: we could produce hy- <br />pothetical spatial configurations of conditions in <br />proportion to their probabilities of occurrence and <br />thus generate representative samplings of condi- <br />tions that faithfully reproduce the relations in the <br />observed (historical) hydrological record. By <br />stringing a number of such outputs together, year <br />after year, we could even produce representative <br />sequences of conditions over as long a period as <br />we wished. These sequences could then be used to <br />predict hypothetical scenarios of cui-ui population <br />dynamics, each scenario being an equally likely <br />future. Then if for some regime of supplemental <br />water 20 out of every 100 such simulations led to <br />population die off, for example, we could conclude <br />