<br />MODELING CUI-UI RECOVERY
<br />
<br />practical; even if undisturbed by humans, popu-
<br />lations eventually disappear. Natural alterations
<br />occur in the environment; social values and pres-
<br />sures change. A more practical approach is to con-
<br />sider indefinite as a time span that reflects dimin-
<br />ishing interest in more and more distant future
<br />events by our present society. Conservation bi-
<br />ologists are fond of thinking in terms of 1,000
<br />years. But when we stop to consider that 1,000
<br />years ago the Norman conquest was still three gen-
<br />erations in the future, a millenium begins to seem
<br />like a very long time. Thompson (1991) stated that
<br />though no theoretical rationale supports a univer-
<br />sal time period of persistence, consolation can be
<br />derived from the frequency with which researchers
<br />have used 100 years. This value, however, is too
<br />short for cui-ui because it covers only 2.5 life spans.
<br />A more reasonable and, in terms of a collective,
<br />societal attention span, realistic time frame is two
<br />centuries. This value is similar to the 250 years
<br />considered for the northern spotted owl Strix oc-
<br />cidentalis (Thomas et al. 1990). Accordingly, the
<br />definition of indefinite in this report is taken to be
<br />200 years.
<br />There is never certainty that a population will
<br />persist for 200 years. At what level of probability
<br />are we to be satisfied that a species has recovered?
<br />In keeping with standard statistical procedure for
<br />distinguishing between a null hypothesis (extinc-
<br />tion) and its alternative, we suggest 95% as an
<br />acceptable level. Thompson (1991) suggested re-
<br />liance on this percentage because of the numerous
<br />researchers that have used similar values in the
<br />past.
<br />
<br />Models Used
<br />
<br />As noted above, we believe the driving envi-
<br />ronmental variable for cui.ui population dynam-
<br />ics is availability of water. Even many secondary
<br />factors, such as temperature effects on egg devel-
<br />opment and survival, are controlled largely by wa-
<br />ter supply. Accordingly, the model used to project
<br />the cui-ui population is driven by river flow. That
<br />is, it assumes that cui.ui reproduction and mor-
<br />tality are mediated solely through hydrologic con-
<br />ditions. This approach does not deny the possible
<br />importance of other ecological factors (e.g., pre-
<br />dation on larvae by other species). It merely re-
<br />flects our belief in the overriding influence of lake
<br />level and the efficacy of model simplicity.
<br />Because cui-ui population dynamics depend on
<br />hydrology, and because acquired water would be
<br />only supplemental to the underlying hydrological
<br />events, predictions of future fish population size
<br />
<br />469
<br />
<br />must reflect future natural hydrologic scenarios.
<br />These scenarios cannot be known with certainty.
<br />Thus, it is necessary to rely on probabilistic pro-
<br />jections. For such projections to be valid, two re-
<br />quirements must be considered.
<br />First, hydrologic sequences are likely to be au-
<br />tocorrelated-that is, a wet year might more likely
<br />be followed by another wet year than by a dry one
<br />or vice versa. Of course, the correlation between
<br />adjacent years might be positive and the correla-
<br />tion between years t and t + 2 might be negative.
<br />Any predicted future scenario must reflect such
<br />autocorrelations.
<br />Second, hydrologic events are correlated in space,
<br />at least within a watershed. For example, snowfall
<br />in the Truckee River watershed and water avail-
<br />ability in Stampede Reservoir, a reservoir dedi-
<br />cated to cui-ui in the Truckee River basin, affect
<br />available flow in the lower Truckee River. Any
<br />predicted future scenario must reflect these spatial
<br />relations.
<br />Information inherent in the above two require-
<br />ments can be captured by describing the proba-
<br />bility that a certain hydrological condition will
<br />occur at some point, A, as a function of what is
<br />happening at points B, C, etc., and what has hap-
<br />pened at point A in previous years. Such a de-
<br />scription is known as a conditional probability
<br />density function. If we possessed such a density
<br />function and if, in addition, we knew point A's
<br />history and also the upcoming conditions at B, C,
<br />etc., we would be able to predict the probability
<br />of the upcoming condition at A. If we were to
<br />obtain an expression that gave this probability for
<br />all points A, B, C, etc., simultaneously (a multi-
<br />variate conditional probability density function),
<br />we would be able to predict simultaneously the
<br />probability of any upcoming spatial configuration
<br />of conditions over the various points. In fact, we
<br />could do better than this: we could produce hy-
<br />pothetical spatial configurations of conditions in
<br />proportion to their probabilities of occurrence and
<br />thus generate representative samplings of condi-
<br />tions that faithfully reproduce the relations in the
<br />observed (historical) hydrological record. By
<br />stringing a number of such outputs together, year
<br />after year, we could even produce representative
<br />sequences of conditions over as long a period as
<br />we wished. These sequences could then be used to
<br />predict hypothetical scenarios of cui-ui population
<br />dynamics, each scenario being an equally likely
<br />future. Then if for some regime of supplemental
<br />water 20 out of every 100 such simulations led to
<br />population die off, for example, we could conclude
<br />
|