Laserfiche WebLink
<br />19 <br /> <br />Table 17. Photography - videography cost comparisons. <br /> <br />Cost component <br /> <br />CIR aerial photography <br /> <br />Airborne videography <br /> <br />Data acquisition <br />Field work (2 staff weeks) <br />Image interpretation <br />Map preparation <br />Digitization <br />Computer costs <br />Plotting <br />Report <br /> <br />S5,600 <br />4,000 <br />3,000 <br />2,000 <br />2,000 <br />400 <br />400 <br />1,000 <br /> <br />SI,600 <br />4,000 <br />3,000 <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />1,000 <br /> <br />Totals <br /> <br />S18,400 <br /> <br />S9,600 <br /> <br />Cost for data acquisition was based on 21 rm; interpretation cost was based <br />on 6 rm. <br /> <br />The total cost for aerial photography/GIS was approximately twice that of <br />airborne videography/MIPS. The costs for image interpretation of <br />videography may be reduced significantly as image analysts become more <br />familiar with videography images and the computer software used. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />1986 Pilot Study <br /> <br />The 1986 pilot study indicated that 1:4,000 scale color infrared aerial <br />photography could be successfully used to determine backwater availability <br />on the Green River. Analysis of the two 1,889 ft3/s flows photographed at <br />different times produced some interesting observations. The October Flaming <br />Gorge Dam releases averaged 2,700 ft3/s with a high flow of 3,240 ft3/S~ and <br />the November releases averaged 3,800 ft3/s with a high flow of 4,180 ft Is. <br />Apparently flows of this magnitude were sufficient to displace and degrade <br />sandbars. These high flow events increased total backwater area by about <br />57 percent although total backwaters decreased. <br /> <br />1987 Study <br /> <br />Optimum flows for maximizing Green River backwater habitat varied among <br />sites. However, the data indicated a range of flows which produced maximal <br />backwater area and numbers under the conditions of the study. When the four <br />upper sites are considered, a range of flows from 1,101 to 1,773 ft3/s <br />produced substantially more backwater area and numbers than did 5,260 and <br />2,423 ft3/s flows. The Island Park and Jensen sites had predictably more <br />backwater area as flows were decreased, and backwater area was maximized at <br />a range of 1,101 to about 1,430 ft3/s. The large increase in backwater area <br />