Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1,687 cfs did not occur at lower flows, therefore, backwater area <br />was much lower at these flows. The average size of all backwaters <br />at the Ouray site2was much larger than aZ Island Park and Jensen, <br />ranging from 417 m at 1,381 cfs to 831 m at 1,773 cfs. Backwaters <br />per mile ranged from 3.9 at 5,260 cfs to 6.6 at 1,381 cfs, somehwat <br />less than Island Park and Jensen. Backwater area2per mile at Ouray <br />was the2 most of any site, ranging from 1,678 m at 5,260 cfs to <br />4,697 m at 1,687 cfs. <br /> <br />Sand Wash <br /> <br />Table 7 (Appendix A) presents the area of each class for each flow <br />at the Sand W2sh Site. The lowest backwater area occurred at 5,262 <br />cfs [ 4,962 m (1.2 ac)]. Backwater area increased 71% to 8,466 m <br />(2.1 ac) at 2,423 cfs, and in~reased again (32%) at 1,773 cfs where <br />it was maximized at 11,147 m (2.8 ac). Backwater area decreased <br />somewha~ at 1,687 cfs, decreased sUbstantially at 1,430 cfs to <br />5,713 m (1.4 ac), and then increased again (92%) at 1,381 cfs. The <br />low backwater area at 1,430 cfs was an anomoly and examination of <br />the open water class area indicates that river flow was actually <br />lower at this point than at any other flow. The 1,430 flow was <br />maintained for one day at the Jensen gauge and we do not believe <br />this flow had reached the Sand Wash site when the photography was <br />acquired. The actual flow was probably less than that at 1,101 <br />cfs. Backwater formation at 1,430 cfs was further complicated by <br />the chronology of flows as previously discussed. <br /> <br />The flow at Sand Wash was difficult to determine because the White <br />and Duchesne Rivers enter the Green River between Sand Wash and the <br />Jensen gauge. Furthermore, the Price River enters the Green River <br />between the Sand Wash site and the Green River gauge which would <br />cause the Green River gauge readings to be higher than the flow at <br />Sand Wash. Given these facts, it is still apparent that backwater <br />area at the Sand Wash site was maximized at flows below 2,423 cfs <br />as measured at the Jensen gauge. <br /> <br />Table 8 (Appendix A) presents the backwater number, size <br />distribution, area, and average size of backwaters for each flow at <br />the Sand Wash site. The total number of all backwaters ranged from <br />11, at 1,430 and 1,101 cfs, to 22 at 5,260 cfs. The Sand Wash site <br />was unique because backwater number was maximized at the highest <br />flow. Furthermore, backwater numbers were much more evenly <br />distributed among the various size classes than at the upper sites. <br />Backwaters per mile ranged from 2.9 at 1,430 and 1,101 cfs to 5.8 <br />at 5,260 cfs, the 12west of the upper four siZes. Backwater area <br />ranged from 1,306 m at 5,260 cfs to 2,933 m at 1,773 cfs. The <br />average backwater size ranged from re~atively small at 5,260 (226 <br />M) to quite large at 1,381 cfs (906 m ). Generally, the Sand Wash <br />