My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7632
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7632
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:44:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7632
Author
Pucherelli, M. J., J. N. Halls and R. C. Clark.
Title
Green River Channel Mapping Study, 1987.
USFW Year
1987.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2 <br /> <br />that there were any changes in channel morphology between 1963 and <br />1964. The 1974, 1978, and 1986 photographs cover the entire study <br />area. All photographs are black and white, at various scales: <br />1952 - 1:20,000; 1963 - 1:24,000; 1974 - 1:31,680; 1978 1:33,000; and <br />1986 - 1:24,000. <br /> <br />Each photograph was fitted with a mylar overlay on which the photointerpre- <br />tation classes were drawn. The river channel was delineated by drawing <br />the high-water embankment lines and vegetated islands. Following photo- <br />interpretation, polygons were transferred to U.S. Geological Survey <br />standard map quadrangles. A map-o-graph transfer machine was used <br />to adjust the photographs to 1:24,000 scale. To maintain accuracy, <br />all roads, trails, and creeks on the photographs were matched with <br />the roads, trails, and creeks on the map bases. To calculate the length <br />of each reach of the river, a line was delineated through the middle <br />of the channel. This calculated length was used to determine average <br />channel width rather than estimated lengths in the Green River Wilderness <br />Desolation River Guide. The data were then digitized into a GIS (Geographic <br />Information System) using the GES (Geographic Entry System) software. <br />Acreage listings for each class in each year were tabulated, and black <br />and white map plots at 1:24,000 scale were produced for each 7.5 minute <br />quadrangle and each year. <br /> <br />The river was divided into alluvial and nonalluvial segments as delineated <br />by Joe Lyons, 0-753. River-miles 190 to 170 are alluvial, 170 to 142 <br />are nonalluvial, 142 to 117 are alluvial. Allowing for the discontinuous <br />nature of the 1952 photography, three sites were analyzed for changes <br />in predam channel morphOlogy: site l--river-miles 190 to 170 (alluvial), <br />site 2--river-miles 170 to 166 (nonalluvial), and site 3--river-miles <br />123 to 117 (alluvial). Four sites were analyzed for changes in postdam <br />channel morphology: site 1--river-miles 190 to 170 (alluvial), site 2-- <br />170 to 142 (nonalluvial), site 3--142 to 131 (alluvial), and site 4--128.3 <br />to 117 (alluvial). Total alluvial river-miles analyzed were 41.8 and <br />total nonalluvial river-miles were 27.4. <br /> <br />The errors associated with interpreting aerial photography are the <br />consistency of the interpreter(s) and pencil line widths. Minimizing <br />incorrect boundary delineation is accomplished when only one interpreter <br />is used in making consistent subjective boundary decisions. One tenth <br />of 1 inch represents 200 feet at 1:24,000 scale aerial photography, <br />and the average pencil width represents approximately 10 feet. Therefore, <br />when one interpreter is used, photointerpretation of the range of scales <br />used in this study is accurate to within t20 feet. Additional error <br />can be found in the transfer and digitizing procedures. The transfer <br />process produces map products at the correct scale; however, the geographic <br />placement may be slightly incorrect. The digitizing process has been <br />proven to be highly accurate with very complex data sets, and this <br />data set is believed to be almost 100 percent accurate. There is no <br />method to numerically determine the error involved in either the transfer <br />process or the digitizing process. In conclusion, we believe that <br />with the scale of the photography used, all results reported in this <br />paper are accurate to t20 feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.