Laserfiche WebLink
<br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The long-term impact of the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam on fish populations in the Green <br />River is unknown. However, dams may alter historic flow and temperature regimes and eliminate <br />flood events (Tyus et aI., 1987; Graf, 1980). In response to reduced peaking conditions, the Green <br />River bankfull channel width has decreased substantially following construction of the Flaming <br />Gorge Dam (Andrews, 1986), and the abundance of endemic fish species in the Green River has <br />decreased subsequent to the construction of Flaming Gorge Dam in 1962 (Tyus et aI., 1987). These <br />species included the endangered Colorado squawfish (Ptchoecheilus lucius), the humpback chub <br />(Gila cypha), and the rare but unlisted razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus). <br /> <br />Studies conducted by the FWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) concluded that backwaters in the <br />Green River are preferred nursery habitat for yoy (young-of-the-year) Colorado squawfish (Holden <br />and Stalnaker, 1975; Holden, 1977; Tyus and McAda, 1984; Tyus et aI., 1987). Colorado squawfish <br />spawn during mid- to late-summer and their larvae become distributed in shallow backwater habitat <br />reducing predation and protecting larvae from adverse flow events (Tyus et aI., 1987). This <br />evidence suggests that maximizing backwater habitat during summer will increase the survival rate <br />of young Colorado squawfish and, therefore, would be an important factor in the management and <br />preservation of this species. <br /> <br />A technique was required to accurately map backwater habitat in response to various Green River <br />flows. The IFIM (instream flow incremental method) has not proven adequate to calculate <br />backwaters on large, turbid, hydrologically complex rivers such as the Green River (Rose and Hann, <br />1989). IFIM uses PHABSIM (physical habitat simulation models) to calculate physical habitat, <br />assuming that velocity, depth, and substrate in a river system behave as independent hydraulic <br />variables. On the contrary it is believed that these variables interact continuously along the length <br />of a river by varying turbulence and shear stresses and it is doubtful that they may be considered <br />independent (Gore and Nestler, 1988). In addition, PHABSIM uses velocity to calculate physical <br />habitat and, because backwaters have little or no velocity, it is impossible to model them accurately. <br />Attempts to model backwaters using IFIM on the Green River were not successful (Rose and Hann, <br />1989). Therefore, it was decided to use remote sensing techniques and a GIS (Geographic <br />Information System). Pucherelli et a1. (1987) used large-scale aerial photography and a GIS to map <br />backwater habitat and changes in river morphology as a function of riverflow. <br /> <br />This study examined the relationship between flow and the number and area of backwaters on the <br />Green River in Utah. The objective was to establish a data base to assist in determining the <br />optimal Green River flows needed for maximum backwater availability during summer and fall. <br /> <br />STUDY SITES <br /> <br />Five study sites (fig. 1) were selected by the FWS and the Bureau of Reclamation because they were <br />known to contain important backwater habitat for yoy Colorado squawfish (Tyus et aI., 1987). The <br />Island Park site is located just upstream from Split Mountain in Dinosaur National Monument; the <br />Jensen site is located just downstream from Split Mountain; the Ouray site is located in Ouray <br />National Wildlife Refuge; the Sand Wash site is just above Desolation Canyon; and the Mineral <br />Bottom site is located about 80 kilometers upstream from the confluence of the Colorado and <br />Green Rivers. <br />