Laserfiche WebLink
<br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />Following the construction of Flaming Gorge Dam in 1962, the abundance of endemic fIsh species <br />in the Green River has decreased. These species include the endangered Colorado squawfish <br />(Ptychocheilus lucius), the humpback chub (Gila cypha), and the rare, but unlisted, razorback sucker <br />(Xyrauchen texanus). The dam has altered the natural state of the Green River by reducing flood <br />events and their severity, increasing late fall and winter fluctuations, and in general altering natural <br />flows throughout the year (Tyus et aI., 1987). Studies conducted by the Fish and Wildlife SelVice <br />(SelVice) have concluded that backwaters in the Green River serve as important nursery habitat for <br />young-of-the-year Colorado squawfish (Tyus et aI., 1987; Tyus and McAda, 1984). The Remote <br />Sensing Section, Research and Laboratory Services Division, Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), <br />has been studying the use of remote sensing techniques and the effects of Flaming Gorge Dam <br />releases on downstream fish habitat in the Green River since summer 1986 (Pucherelli et al., 1988, <br />1989a, 1989b; Pucherelli and Clark, 1989). <br /> <br />Reclamation initiated an ISMP (interagency standardized monitoring program) for the upper basin <br />reaches of the Green and Colorado Rivers, beginning at their confluence. Study parameters were <br />collected in a standardized fashion and include various fish species and their habitats, including <br />backwaters and side channels. This monitoring process will allow a correlation between fish capture <br />data and the quantification of their habitat. <br /> <br />Although aerial photography is currently the optimum method for mapping and determining various <br />riverine habitat, the cost of this method is prohibitive for extensive studies. Consequently, a more <br />cost-effective alternative for mapping backwater availability using videography was investigated <br />during 1988 (Pucherelli and Clark, 1989). The investigation found that the quality of videography <br />was sufficient to replace aerial photography for use in river monitoring studies. <br /> <br />The objectives of this study were (1) to calculate backwater and side channel numbers and area and <br />channel width by river-mile for four monitoring reaches on the Green and Colorado Rivers; (2) to <br />correlate the river habitat data with CPUE (catch-per-unit effort) data collected by participating <br />agencies - the SelVice, the Colorado Division of Wildlife, and the Utah Division of Wildlife <br />Resources; and (3) to correlate backwater and side channel data with riverflow. Valuable <br />information will be compiled to assist managers and researchers in facilitating the recovery of the <br />endangered fish in the upper Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />METHODS <br /> <br />Four study reaches were selected by the Service, Reclamation, and State wildlife agencies from <br />Colorado and Utah in areas known to contain important backwater habitat for young-of-the-year <br />Colorado squawfish: reach 1 - Colorado River from the confluence with the Green River to river- <br />mile 110 (Cisco Landing); reach 2 -Colorado River, river-miles 140 to 170 (Ruby Canyon to Grand <br />Junction); reach 3 - Green River from the confluence with the Colorado River to river-mile 120 <br />(town of Green River, Utah); and reach 4 - Green River, river-miles 200 to 317 (beginning of <br />Desolation Canyon to Split Mountain). River-mile designations were established by measuring <br />distance along the center line of the river directly on GS (Geological SUlVey) 7.5-minute topographic <br />quadrangles with a map wheel. <br />