Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Green River Upper and Lower Monitoring Reaches - 1989 <br /> <br />The upper monitoring reach of the Green River was generally wider (table 3) and had substantially <br />more backwater and side channel numbers and area than the lower reach (tables 1,2). Backwater <br />number/mile in the upper reach was greatest from river-miles 236 to 295, while backwater <br />area/mile was greatest from river-miles 236 to 275 (table 1). In the lower reach, backwater/mile <br />was fairly consistent, but backwater area/mile was substantially greater for river miles 16-75 than <br />other segments. River-miles 0 to 15 and 76 to 95 had the least backwater number and area/mile, <br />and this trend was also reported for 1988 (Pucherelli and Clark, 1989). The upper reach was flown <br />on 2 consecutive days and consequently, two different flows were video taped. Flow at the Jensen <br />gauge increased from 1,023 to 1,236 fe /s on September 27 and increased again to 1,420 fe /s on <br />September 28. Video taping was started at about the Ouray bridge on September 28 and, therefore, <br />backwater number and area above this point may have been slightly effected, and were probably <br />decreased somewhat from the previous day, if trends from previous studies are consistent <br />(Pucherelli and Clark 1989). Channel width measurements are not effected by flow, as the bank <br />full width is measured regardless of flow. <br /> <br />Side channel number and area/mile were about 80 percent less for the lower reach than the upper <br />reach (table 2). The upper reach is generally more braided with more islands and associated sand <br />bars. <br /> <br />Colorado River Upper and Lower Monitoring Reaches - 1989 <br /> <br />The upper reach of the Colorado River is generally wider than the lower reach (table 6), with <br />substantially more backwaters (table 4) and side channels (table 5). Although the lower reach had <br />fewer and smaller backwaters (table 4), some segments had more backwater number and area/mile <br />than others (river-miles 0 to 20, 41 to 60, and 101 to 110). Side channel area/mile was about 80 <br />percent greater for the upper reach than the lower (table 5). <br /> <br />Green River 1988-1989 Backwater Comparisons <br /> <br />The Green River was video taped from its confluence with the Colorado to its confluence with the <br />Yampa, in September 1988 to acquire low-flow baseline backwater information (Pucherelli and <br />Clark, 1989). The lower and upper monitoring reaches were extracted from the 1988 data and <br />compared with the 1989 backwater data in table 7. Flows at the GS Jensen gauge were slightly <br />higher when the 1988 photography was acquired than for the 1989 (see flow table in methods) video <br />dates, and this may effect any comparisons between the 2 years. However, we feel the flows were <br />close enough to make some general observations. <br /> <br />There were substantially fewer backwaters recorded in 1989 for both reaches, but backwaters were <br />larger in 1989 than 1988. Backwater number was reduced by 44 percent from 1988 to 1989, from <br />208 to 116 in the lower reach, but backwater area increased 12 percent from 60,924 to 68,457 m2. <br />The average size of a backwater more than doubled, increasing from 293 to 590 m2. This may be <br />a function of the low flows that occurred during 1989. <br /> <br />In the upper reach, backwater number decreased by 34 percent in 1989 from 567 to 376. Backwater <br />area increased 16 percent from 212,893 to 247,635 m2 and the average backwater size increased <br />from 375 to 659 m2. Figures 2 and 3 represent a video image of river-mile 254 (Ouray site) from <br /> <br />7 <br />