Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />I . ~ <br />, <br />" <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Biological studies have demonstrated the importance of the Yampa River as <br />spawning habitat for Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius) (Archer and <br />Tyus 1984; Haynes et al. 1984), and as habitat for the adult life stages of <br />both Colorado squawfish (Wick et al. 1983; Haynes et al. 1985), and humpback <br />chub (Gila ~) (Tyus and Karp 1989). It is evident from repeated captures <br />of ripe fish that the majority of Colorado squawfish and humpback chub <br />spawning activity (i.e., the actual deposition and fertilization of eggs) in <br />the Yampa occurs in a unique reach between river mile (RM) 12 and 20. Adult <br />Colorado squawfish (450+ mm in total length) have been captured throughout the <br />Yampa River from the mouth to near the town of Hayden, Colorado (P. Martinez, <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife, personal communication). Concentration areas <br />include from the confluence with the Little Snake River upstream to Juniper <br />Canyon, RM 51 to 89, and from Juniper Canyon upstream to Round Bottom, RM 91 <br />to 124. Adult humpback chub (200+ mm in total length) have been captured from <br />Yampa Canyon upstream to Cross Mountain, RM 18 to 56, with concentrations, and <br />spawning activity presumably occurring within Yampa Canyon from RM 18 to 37 <br />(Tyus and Karp 1989). <br /> <br />Historic flows of the Yampa River, largest tributary of the Green River, have <br />not been significantly altered by dams (Miller et al. 1982). However, several <br />water development projects are planned which may significantly alter existing <br />flows, and consequently, the riverine habitats used by endangered fishes. A <br />primary goal towards the recovery of these fishes is the acquisition and <br />management of instream flows. This can best be accomplished in the Yampa <br />River by acquiring and appropriating sufficient water rights to maintain <br />current populations of fishes and protect their habitats. <br /> <br />Through application of the Physical Habitat Simulation System (PHABSIM), as <br />described by Milhous et al. 1984, the computer simulation of physical <br />microhabitat for Colorado squawfish and humpback chub as a function of stream <br />flow has been attempted. As early as 1978 researchers began to investigate <br />the feasibility of applying instream flow methodologies to endangered fishes <br />on the Yampa River. Prewitt et al. (1982) reported results from five instream <br />flow study sites on the Yampa River. Study sites were located at Box Elder <br />(RM 2), Cleopatra's Couch (RM 16.5), Lilly Park (RM 50), Cross Mountain (RM <br />53) and Maybell (RM 72). Habitat suitability index (SI) curves for young-of- <br />the-year, adult and spawning Colorado squawfish were developed from depth, <br />velocity and substrate data collected throughout the Green and Colorado Rivers <br />during 1979 through 1981. PHABSIM was used in an attempt to simulate physical <br />habitat availability as a function of discharge. Prewitt's results were <br />inconclusive and were not supported by species experts because flows suggested <br />by model outputs as providing optimal habitat conditions had never been <br />observed in the Yampa River. <br /> <br />In 1983 the Fish and Wildlife Service established two new PHABSIM study sites <br />on the Yampa River and developed new SI curves for spawning and adult Colorado <br />squawfish from data collected on the Yampa River only. Rose (1984) reported <br />the results of these studies; however, they did not support biological <br />observations and were again rejected by species experts. <br />