My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7618
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7618
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:43:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7618
Author
Rose, K. L. and D. R. Hann.
Title
Summary of Historic Habitat Modeling on the Yampa River Using the Physical Habitat Simulation System
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Final Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />relationships that are biologically meaningful. Predictive outputs are not <br />supported by field observations. <br /> <br />In the Yampa River, where fish are successfully spawning every year and where <br />adults reside year-round, it can be assumed that the existing natural <br />conditions are conducive to success of endangered fishes. Model outputs for <br />the species and life stages examined herein do not predict flow/habitat optima <br />that even remotely approximate natural flow conditions, and do not fit within <br />the framework of a normal hydrograph. <br /> <br />The SI curve is the presumed biological link between fish and the available <br />and usable stream habitat. It is the state-of-the-art of human attempts to <br />simplify and quantify nature. Of the three variables sampled, water velocity <br />is probably the most influential factor for spawning and adult habitat <br />selection. The model output is also the most sensitive to changes in the <br />shape of the velocity curve. Depth is also important, however, after <br />exceeding some minimum, depth may not greatly influence habitat selection by <br />target species. loosely-compacted gravel is probably important for spawning, <br />although the other uses of gravel as substrate for invertebrates. and/or as <br />cover, need to be more clearly defined and understood. Cover requirements of <br />adult Colorado squawfish and humpback chub may dominate their selection of <br />microhabitat. Biological needs may quickly shift from protected low-velocity <br />habitats for resting areas, to higher velocity, deeper water which may afford <br />optimal feeding positions. The preservation of a balance of these habitats <br />does not appear practicable with present technology without substantive inputs <br />of empirical biological information. <br /> <br />Stream flow modeling using PHABSIM is more of an art form than a pure science. <br />Predictive model output (simulations) can be no better than the hydraulic <br />data. species criteria, and the ability of the model user to calibrate. select <br />the appropriate software application. and interpret results. However, the <br />need to quantify habitat for fish and wildlife use is increasingly important <br />as greater demands are put on an already limited water supply. PHABSIM can be <br />used as a management tool to assess some physical changes in habitat as a <br />result of altered streamflow. However, the link between the physical model <br />and the biological needs of endangered fish species needs significant <br />improvement before it can be used as a basis for determining instream flow <br />requirements for the Yampa River. Further, we believe that future field data <br />collections should focus on critical areas and/or limitin9 habitats rather <br />than on "representative reaches II so that collection of more detailed. high- <br />quality, site specific data is feasible. <br /> <br />Finally. we believe that a holistic approach to endangered fish management is <br />essential. and the species (or life stages) selected for study should reflect <br />the environmental constraints on the population as a whole. Formulating <br />stream flow recommendations for adults is meaningless if channel stability, <br />spawning, larval transport exotic competition and/or other factors are <br />limiting to the population of target fishes. An estimate of WUA as a function <br />of discharge is not an end in itself. Unless this index can be related to the <br />success of endangered fishes in some quantifiable way. it should not be used <br />as the basis for a State water right filing for protection of endangered <br />fishes. <br /> <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.