Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />was too deep to safely cross, the sei ne haul s began and ended on the same <br />shoreline, sampling as deep as possible. Shallow backwaters that were long and <br />narrow were also sampled parallel to shore to increase the sampling area. <br />Para 11 e 1 sei ne haul s were termi nated away from the end of the backwater to <br />prevent crowding. Data recorded for the first seine haul included the following: <br />.B.ll rare_f.llhes t.~at could be reliabl identified in t!le field were measur~j.m:J <br />re 1 eased. A 11 otfler 1 s es re 1a 1 ent' . Ii .c6Ufifea- anarereased. <br />~nlaentllie lS es were reserve % buffered forma ln or 1 1 lca 10n <br />in tea oratory. . In e secon selne aul, all rarefrs-es werenanal'edthe <br />same-a"s-in-tfie-rirst seine haul. ather fishes reliably identified were released <br />without enumeration. Third and fourth seine hauls were made in some larger <br />backwaters to increase the chance of catching rare fishes. Due to the scarcity <br />of backwaters above RMI 15.0, all backwaters of approximately 30 m2 or greater <br />surface area were seined. Below RMI 15.0, lout of every 3 or 4 backwaters were <br />seined. In August, seining efforts between RMI 15-5 concentrated on the shallow <br />temporary backwaters located on the downstream ends of point sand bars. Seining <br />efforts in the same river reach in September concentrated on the deeper, more <br />stable backwaters located near mouths of the numerous washes (e.g., Oljeto, <br />Steer, Whirlwind, etc.) where yay Colorado squawfish were collected by the BOR <br />in 1987. <br /> <br />Physjcal habitat measurements were taken at all areas seined with <br />standardized methods. Maximum water depth, length and width of habitat and of <br />area seined, water depth at the midpoint of the long axis of the backwater and <br />water depths midway between the shorelines and the midpoint were recorded at <br />each backwater. In backwaters where seine hauls began and ended on the same <br />shoreline, the deepest depth and depths 1/3 and 2/3 of the distance between the <br />shoreline and the outside edge of the sampled area were measured. The size of <br />the predominant and second most common substrate on either side of the maximum <br />seining depth was estimated and recorded. The silt/mud depth at the mid-point <br />of the long axis of the backwater was also recorded. Data for each seine haul <br />also included water temperature at the mid-point of the long axis of the habitat, <br />and water temperature in the mid-channel of the river adjacent to the habitat <br />seined. <br /> <br />Incidental yay seining was conducted in conjunction with spring electro- <br />fishing (RMI 135-87) and canyon netting (RMI 60-20). The primary objective of <br />the incidental seining was to document the distribution of yay and/or juvenile <br />rare fishes. Areas seined included backwaters, isolated pools, back eddies and <br />other slow moving riverine habitats. Width and length of each seine haul was <br />measured to quantify density of fishes. <br /> <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Mean monthly flows were considerably lower in 1988 than in 1987 and post- <br />Navajo Dam years, 1965-1986 (Figure 4). Differences in the electrofishing/YOY <br />seining catch rates and species composition between the two study years are <br />probably related to these flows. It is difficult to draw any conclusions .based <br />on two years of data, especially when the two years were extremely different in <br />terms of the flows. . <br /> <br />10 <br />