My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7245
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7245
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:42:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7245
Author
Rose, K. L. and D. R. Hann.
Title
Consolidated Instream Flow Report, Habitat Modeling on the Green River Using the Physical Habitat Simulation System.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2. Study Site Selection <br /> <br />The PHABSIM methodology allows for two approaches to study site selection-- <br />critical reach and representative reach (Trihey 1979). A critical reach is an <br />area that is extremely important for the continued survival of a species. <br />Determining a critical reach requires a rather extensive knowledge of the <br />stream hydrology and channel geometry in addition to species-specific life <br />history requirements. Given the limited knowledge of hydrologic and biologic <br />interactions controlling the fish populations, the critical reach approach was <br />considered inappropriate method upon which to select a site. A representative <br />reach on the other hand depicts the stream as a whole rather than <br />concentrating on one specific area. It is intended to incorporate all the <br />different variations which occur within the segment of the stream and <br />indicates the importance of hydrologic and geomorphic gradations within a <br />watershed for determining macrohabitat conditions. Study sites reported <br />herein were selected, and transects placed to "represent" habitats within <br />their respective sub-segments. <br /> <br />3. Field Measurements <br /> <br />Channel Qeometry and hydraulics <br /> <br />Field data collection in preparation for PHABSIM is based upon measurements of <br />certain parameters at multiple stream cross-sections according to techniques <br />described by Trihey and Wegner (1981). Site specific data essential for <br />su~cessful use of a hydraulic simulation model is obtained at a minimum of <br />four cross sections referenced to a common bench mark to characterize the <br />general cross-sectional shape and longitudinal streambed profile. The depths <br />and velocities measured at each cross section represent the average <br />characteristics of the stream hydraulics within an imaginary cell extending <br />half the distance to the next upstream and downstream transects and half the <br />distance to each adjacent vertical. Thus within each "cell" the water depth <br />and velocity are considered homogeneous. The number of verticals per transect <br />will vary depending on streambed configuration, width of the stream and <br />complexity of velocity distribution. <br /> <br />In general, after the transects, benchmark, and headstakes have been selected <br />and surveyed, a kevlar cable is strung from river left to river right and a <br />flat-bottom boat attached to the cable. A sounding weight is lowered from the <br />bow of the boat by a pulley system to obtain the water column depth and then <br />raised to 0.2 and 0.8 tenths of the total depth for velocity measurements. In <br />shallow areas, less than 2.5 feet, the velocity meter is attached to a top-set <br />wading rod to record velocities at 0.6 depth. The following sequence of <br />activities provides a general outline of the field activities and data <br />requirements of a PHABSIM study after the species and life stages of concern, <br />and study sites have been identified: <br /> <br />1. Identify cross sections, mark with headpins (rebar) and fenceposts. <br />These cross sections will represent differing hydraulic characteristics, <br />typical microhabitat conditions (i.e. pools, runs), and hydraulic <br />controls. <br /> <br />2. Survey a level line loop to determine relative headstake elevations. <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.