Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1. Field Measurements <br /> <br />The data collected at the Ouray site consists of seven transects, three sets <br />of water surface elevations with concurrently measured discharges, and one set <br />of velocity distribution measurements. Three of the seven transects represent <br />side channel backwater. A side channel backwater is defined as a secondary <br />channel or fingerlike projection, depending on the flow, commonly occurring <br />behind a sandbar or island. <br /> <br />2. Model Calibration <br /> <br />The IFG4 program was used to calculate the stage-discharge relationship for <br />the first transect. The mean error for the three measured versus predicted <br />discharges was 8.2 percent (National Ecology Center, 1987). The stage- <br />discharge equation for the first transect was used to calibrate the water <br />surface profile (WSP) program. <br /> <br />During the initial calibration of measured versus predicted water surface <br />elevations using a constant n value, a range of 0.01 to 0.34 of a foot was the <br />best fit achievable (National Ecology Center, 1987). Transect seven <br />consistently had the greatest difference in measured versus predicted water <br />surface elevations. Therefore, since this transect did not cross the side <br />channel backwater and was not critical to the simulation, it was dropped. <br />Supsequent calibration runs resulted in reducing the differences in measured <br />versus predicted water surface elevations to a range of 0.01 to 0.16. A <br />variable Manning's n was plotted and inserted in the WSP calibration input <br />file. <br /> <br />The production run for WSP was made for a range of flows from 1000 to 10000 <br />cfs. The WSEI4S program was used to insert water surface elevations into the <br />IFG4 input files on the WSL cards. <br /> <br />To simulate the backwater, the input files were split into a low flow and high <br />flow range. From the WSP production run it was determined that the water <br />surface elevation that matched the invert elevation of the upstream inlet <br />(91.42 ft.) occurred at a discharge of 3200 cfs. Therefore, the simulation <br />was split ~t this point. <br /> <br />In order to evaluate the side channel habitat, the three stations that cross <br />the side channel backwater were "tagged" by changing the substrate values from <br />2, 3, and 4 to 12, 13, and 14 and concurrently changing the substrate <br />suitability curve. Thus 12, 13, and 14 were made to have an index value of <br />1.0, while 2, 3, and 4 were changed to 0.0. Consequently, the habitat would <br />be usable only if the depth and velocity criteria were met. In addition, the <br />n values were increased to 99.9 at these three stations, thus causing the <br />velocities to be 0.0. <br /> <br />35 <br />