Laserfiche WebLink
<br />populations (Fig. 4). SSH may be the least destructive among various <br />energy alternatives for a given site and, therefore, contribute to reducing <br />env i ronmenta 1 degradat i on from other causes. However, each site must be <br />considered individually to determine if SSH is less environmentally <br />damaging than competing energy options. <br /> <br />2.2 CONFLICTS OF SMALL-SCALE HYDRO WITH OTHER USES <br /> <br />2.2.1 Fish and Wildlife Conflicts <br /> <br />Based on experience with various hydro projects and other activities that <br />affect rivers, several important concerns associated with SSH projects have <br />been identified. The most signficant SSH impacts can be grouped as <br />follows: <br /> <br />1. Blockage (and mortality) of both upstream- and downstream- <br />migrating fish by dams, diversion structures, turbines, <br />spillways, and waterways; <br /> <br />2. Alteration of stream and riverine habitats, natural lakes, <br />riparian areas and wetlands by inundation, dewatering, chan- <br />nelization, and filling; <br /> <br />3. Changes in water quality, including sediment transport dis- <br />solved oxygen, and water temperature; <br /> <br />4. A 1 terat i on of flow reg imes, both increases and decreases, <br />which makes otherwise suitable riverine habitats unfit for <br />aquatic invertebrates, fish, amphibians, and reptiles, and, <br />possibly, dependent riparian species; <br /> <br />5. Fluctuating instream flows and reservoir levels, which make <br />habitats too unstable for full utilization and may degrade <br />water quality; <br /> <br />6. Disturbance of fish and wildlife and their habitats from <br />construction activities, increased numbers of visitors to <br />sites, road dust, oil and toxic waste spills, noise from <br />some hydroelectric equipment, and site lighting, blasting, <br />and waste releases; <br /> <br />7. Damage to terrestrial habitats and soils, disruption of run- <br />off patterns related to road building and transmission line <br />clearance, and creation of borrow pits and spoil disposal <br />sites; <br /> <br />8. Direct effects of transmission lines on fish, wildlife and <br />their habitats. <br /> <br />9. Long term changes in river hydrology, including possible <br />changes in flow regime, the river's contribution to ground <br /> <br />13 <br />