My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8209
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:41:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8209
Author
Rochester, H., T. Lloyd and M. Farr.
Title
Physical Impacts of Small-Scale Hydroelectric Facilities and Their Effects on Fish and Wildlife.
USFW Year
1984.
USFW - Doc Type
14-16-0009-82-020,
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2. OPPORTUNITIES AND CONFLICTS OF <br />SMALL-SCALE HYDROELECTRIC DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />North America has always had an enormous potential for generating <br />power from water, and many early manufacturing concerns were driven by <br />water power. In America, during the 17th and 18th centuries, the power <br />output of most water wheels was less than 8 ki lowatts (kW) each (Melone <br />1982). The first hydraulic turbines appeared in the period 1820-1840. As <br />a result of improvements in dam, canal, and hydraulic machine technology, <br />there was a large expansion in industry, especially in the Northeast. By <br />1870, the average power output from a waterwheel had increased to 17 kW <br />(Malone 1982). <br /> <br />By the 1880's, the use of water power to generate electricity was be- <br />coming widespread. Many potential hydro sites, not economically feasible <br />for mechanical power, became attractive. The power could be transmitted <br />over relatively long distances with little loss of energy, and one station <br />could supply a number of mills, eliminating the need for an elaborate net- <br />work of canals (Malone 1982). Small-scale hydroelectric dams were soon <br />common all over the northeastern United States, with many others in dif- <br />ferent parts of the country. By 1930, most of the mi lls in New England <br />either generated their own electricity or bought it from utilities. During <br />the early 20th century, there were many SSH faci 1 ities bui lt in the far <br />West along the western slope of Sierras. In the Southeast and West, many <br />large-scale hydroelectric projects were built during the Great Depression <br />as public works projects. <br /> <br />Eventually, fossil fuel-powered steam generating plants became as <br />economical as existing hydroelectric dams and more economical than devel- <br />oping marginal sites. During this period (coinciding with the decline of <br />the northeastern textile industry), many small and old hydro works in the <br />eastern U.S. were abandoned. By the mid-20th century, fossil fuel and <br />nuclear plants were producing relatively inexpensive electricity to supply <br />the rapidly increasing demand for power. By 1978, hydro power made up only <br />about 13% (or nearly 60 million kW) of the total electricity generated, and <br />there were approximately 45,000 small dams in the United States that were <br />not producing hydroelectric power (Heutter 1978). <br /> <br />In the 1970's however, escalation in the cost of fossil fuels, supply <br />uncertainties, higher building costs for new thermal electric generation <br />plants, and increasing public concern about the safety of nuclear plants <br />made alternative energy sources, including small-scale hydroelectric, <br />appear much more attractive on economic, social, and environmental grounds. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.