Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The cumulative impact of the Green Mountain depletion, plus that of <br />other recent or planned development (Table 4), would cause significant <br />reductions {10-20%} in monthly and instantaneous flow in the Black Rocks <br />area. Average flows in May and June would be reduced 15 and 12 percent, <br />respectively. These reductions may well al ter temperature patterns, or <br />other habitat parameters, and conti nue favoring more roundtail chubs in <br />that area, causing the increased breakdown of reproductive isolating <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Bonyta i 1 Ch ub <br />The bony tail chub is nearly extinct in the portions of the Colorado <br />River of concern here and, therefore, the proposed project would have no <br />effect on this species. <br />Razorback Sucker <br />The razorback sucker is a candidate species and may be listed in <br />the near future. <br />The depl etions from the Colorado River discussed above would not by <br />themsel ves cause negative impacts to razorbacks for the reasons <br />discussed for Colorado squawfish. <br />The cumulative effect of the Green Mountain Water Sale depletion <br />pl us other potential depl etion as shown in Tabl e 4 could be a probl em <br />for razorbacks. The cumul ative depl etions that would affect the area <br />above Grand Junction are shown in Table 4, and vary from about 187.2 cfs <br />in September to 957 cfs in June. This amount of cumulative depletion is <br />rather large and, therefore, may affect razorback sucker reproductive <br />success in the area near De Buque. <br />It is difficult to say at thi s time if the razorback popul ation <br />above Grand Junction is already doomed to extinction because the river <br />has been depleted sufficiently so that reproductive success is no <br /> <br />- 41 - <br />