My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1006
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
1006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:41:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
1006
Author
Resource Consultants, I.
Title
Biological Assessment Green Mountain Reservoir Water Marketing Program.
USFW Year
1985.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />available to compare with the post-1960 information. Available data <br />suggest the major factors for decl ine in the Colorado River are loss, or <br />changes, in habitat availabil ity for young fish and the increased pre- <br />sence of non-native fish predators (Holden 1979). Backwaters, preferred <br />young squawfi sh habitat, are very rare except below Moab, Utah on the <br />Colorado River, and spawning habitat may also be limiting. Non-native <br />fishes have become abundant in flooded gravel pits near Grand Junction, <br />which provide constant pond type habitat not found in the natural river <br />systems. These ponds are more constant now that flows have become less <br />variable and high flows have become reduced and; therefore, they are <br />more suitable for the non-native species. This increase in non-native <br />fish at the same time that preferred squawfish habitat decl ined is pro- <br />bably the major mechanism affecting squawfish in the Colorado River <br />today. Other authors have suggested that competition or predation by <br />introduced fish was the major factor in the decl ine of squawfish (Behnke <br />and Nugent 1983), but it appears that these interactions with introduced <br />species are primarily important in marginal habitat caused by depleted <br />flows (Holden 1979; Holden and Wick 1982). <br />Holden (1980) compared yearly flow hydrographs for the Green and <br />Yampa rivers with success of Colorado squawfish reproduction measured by <br />the number of young of the year (yoy) found. He showed that during a <br />very low flow year (1977) reproductive success was extremely poor. <br />Haynes (1984) has sampled larval squawfish spawning sites for several <br />years. In 1983, a very high flow year, his catch of larval squawfish in <br />the Yampa River increased nearly thirty-fold over 1982. Similar collec- <br />tions in the Colorado River near Grand Junction were al so made but no <br />dramatic increase in larvae were seen. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br /> <br />- 24 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.