Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />spacing and the degree of pool-riffle development are related to the bed material size relative to the <br />frequency of occurrence of the dominant flow condition that is capable of transporting the bed material. <br /> <br />Unlike alluvial reaches, the morphology of canyon reaches of rivers does not appear to be related to <br />the 1- to 2-year recurrence interval flow (Wolman and Miller, 1960). Pool-riftle spacings in canyon rivers <br />appear to be related to infrequent high magnitude discharges (Graf, 1979; O'Connor et al., 1986). Coarse <br />sediment deposition that forms the riflles occurs where stream power drops below critical-power thresholds <br />necessary for cobblefboulder transport during the infrequent high magnitude events. The stream power <br />minima occur in reaches immediately upstream of canyon bends and constrictions and downstream of <br />canyon expansions, and therefore, canyon morphology plays a large role in the distribution of the pool-riftle <br />sequences in canyon reaches (O'Connor et al., 1986). Elimination of the high magnitude flows as a result of <br />dam construction is likely to cause freezing of existing pool-riffle morphology and spatial distribution <br />because the lower more controlled flows will not be able to mobilize the riflle-forming sediments. <br /> <br />lisle (1986) demonstrated that bedrock bends have significant effects on the location of bars even <br />in channels where the bed materials are mobilized by frequent flows. Bars tend to be located 3 to 4 bed- <br />widths downstream and 1 bed-width upstream of bedrock controlled bends. Changes in hydrology as a result <br />of dam emplacement under these conditions are therefore unlikely to lead to changes in the locations of <br />bars, or to lead to a reduction in the frequency of bars, since bar location and frequency are controlled by <br />the spatial distribution of resistant materials and the frequency of mobilization of the bar-forming materials. <br /> <br />6.1.3. Potential Long-term Sediment Supply. As stated by Andrews (1986) the majority of the <br />sediment transported by the Green River prior to the emplacement of Flaming Gorge Dam was derived <br />from the lower elevation portions of the basin whereas a higher proportion of the runoff was derived from <br />the upper elevations of the basin. Andrews' analysis of the morphologic changes along the Green River that <br />he attributed to the emplacement of the Flaming Gorge Dam (i.e., degradation and channel narrowing) was <br />based on the assumption that the river was in a state of quasi-equilibrium before dam construction, and that <br />the recorded changes in channel morphology were due to the reduction in sediment supply to the reach <br />downstream of the dam. Lyons (1991) concluded that the Green River downstream of the confluence with <br />the Yampa River had reached a new condition of quasi-equilibrium since dam closure in 1963. He <br />considered that the dimensions of the channel are adjusted to the supply of sand-sized sediment. <br /> <br />However, recent work by Schumm et al. (1987) and Schumm and Gellis (1989) brings into <br />question the validity of the assumption that the Green River was in a state of quasi-equilibrium prior to the <br />closure of Flaming Gorge Dam. Their work suggests that the sediment load of the Colorado River had been <br />decreasing since the mid-1920s and that an abrupt decrease occurred in the period 1940-45. The declining <br />sediment load has been attributed to: 1) drought in the sediment producing areas of the drainage basin <br />(Thomas et al., 1963), 2) changes in sediment sampling procedures by the USGS (Schumm et al., 1987), 3) <br />major reductions in the number of livestock and erosion control efforts (Hadley, 1974) and 4) sediment <br />storage within entrenched channels and arroyos following the widespread occurrence of channel trenching in <br />the latter part of the 19th century (Hereford, 1984, 1985; Graf et ai., 1987; Schumm and Gellis, 1989). <br />However, when plotted as a time series the sediment load data indicate that the reductions in sediment load <br />have been progressive rather than abrupt (Schumm and Gellis, 1989). This interpretation of the decline in <br />sediment loads tends to suggest that the reasons are related to geomorphic evolution of the incised channels <br />(Schumm et ai., 1984), but the evolution of the channels is affected by climatic cycles as wen (Hereford, <br />1984, 1985). <br /> <br />Gellis et al. (in press) examined the historical trends in sediment loads and dissolved-solid loads in <br />the Colorado, Green and San Juan Rivers. All of the rivers showed a decline in sediment loads in the 1940s, <br />but the Green River was the only one that also had a change in discharge in the same time period. A <br />characteristic of the Green River was the very large variability of the sediment loads in contrast to the other <br />rivers that were evaluated. However, notwithstanding the high degree of variability, they concluded that <br />there was a substantial decrease in the average annual sediment load in the early 19408 and they estimated <br />that the decrease was on the order of 38 percent at the gaging station located near Green River, Utah. It is <br /> <br />6-3 <br />