My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9568
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9568
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:40:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9568
Author
Resource Consultants Inc.
Title
Sediment Transport Studies of the Little Snake, Yampa, and Green River Systems.
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Incipient motion analysis requires evaluating the average boundary shear stress acting on the channel bed. <br />A common boundary shear stress equation is <br /> <br />T=yRS <br /> <br />(5.3) <br /> <br />where: R is hydraulic radius and <br />S is slope <br /> <br />However, this relationship requires knowledge of the local energy slope, which is difficult to obtain <br />accurately. An alternate approach, based on velocity profile equations, is <br /> <br />L = P V2 . <br /> <br />[5.75Iog( 12.27(y/ K ,))]2 <br /> <br />(5.4) <br /> <br />y is flow depth <br />P is density of water <br />V is mean velocity and <br />Ks is roughness height. <br /> <br />which is based on the more commonly available velocity and flow depth. This equation was selected for use. <br /> <br />where: <br /> <br />All of the variables in equation 5.4 are readily obtainable from the field data with the exception of <br />the representative height of the bed roughness,~. Bray (1982) reviewed factors affecting resistance to flow <br />in gravel bed rivers. He showed that for gravel and cobble bed streams, ~ is approximately equal to 3.5 <br />times the dS4 of the surface bed material. This value was adopted for use in the incipient motion <br />computations for this study. <br /> <br />Incipient motion conditions in the Yampa Canyon were evaluated at two locations: the point bar <br />located on the right bank at Mathers hole (rm 17.5) and the left bank channel at the spawning bar (rm 16.5). <br />Data necessary for the analyses were developed from the National Park Service (NPS) project report <br />(O'Brien, 1984) and the supporting data notebooks. Note that significantly more data was available for <br />Mathers Hole than at the spawning bar for developing hydraulic geometry relationships necessary in the <br />calculation (see Section 5.4.2). <br /> <br />The objective of the analysis was to derme the discharge at which various particle sizes on a cobble <br />bar would be at incipient motion. The following steps summarize the analysis approach: <br /> <br />1. A range of subsurface dSO typical of the cobble bars in Yampa Canyon was dermed based <br />on data at Mathers Hole. <br /> <br />2. The critical dimensionless shear stress was defined for particle sizes of 10, 20, 30 n. 150 mm <br />based on the Andrews type relationship (Equation 5.2). <br /> <br />3. For each particle size the boundary shear stress at incipient motion was defined based on <br />Equation 5.1. <br /> <br />4. The discharge necessary to produce this boundary shear stress was evaluated from <br />Equation 5.4 and hydraulic geometry relationships derived for the cobble bar. <br /> <br />5-15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.