My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9568
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9568
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:40:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9568
Author
Resource Consultants Inc.
Title
Sediment Transport Studies of the Little Snake, Yampa, and Green River Systems.
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br /> <br />5.0 SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSES <br /> <br />5.1 Basic Sediment Transport Theory <br /> <br />5.1.1 Sediment Supplv versus Tran&port C~acity. A key factor in sediment transport analyses <br />is a clear understanding of sediment supply and transport capacity. Sediment supply is primarily that <br />sediment provided to the channel from watershed, tributary inflow, and the channel bed and banks. <br />Transport capacity can be considered the actual physical capability of the channel to transport sediment, as <br />defined by flow conditions. Transport capacity is a function of the size of bed material, flow rate, and <br />geometric and hydraulic properties of the channel. It is significant that transport capacity is typically <br />proportional to water discharge to the 1-2 power, and to velocity to the 3-5 power. In other words, small <br />changes in discharge and velocity can cause large changes in transport capacity. <br /> <br />Note that sediment supplied to the channel may be more or less than the transport capacity of the <br />water in the channel, and it is this interaction which determines whether an aggrading, degrading or a <br />stable condition exists. Either the supply or the transport capacity may limit the actual sediment transport <br />rate in a given channel. The phenomenon of bed material yields being less than the transporting capacity of <br />the river for the sizes of material in the river bed has long been recognized (Muller, 1955; Bagnold, 1966 and <br />1980; Nanson, 1974; Lauffer and Sommer, 1982; Beschta, et.al., 1980; Griffiths, 1980; Carson and Griffiths, <br />1987; Church, 1987; Pitlick and Thome, 1987; Whittaker, 1987). Citations in this section are in Chapter 8.0 <br />and Appendix G together with additional summary material related to the supply limited condition. <br /> <br />Bagnold, 1966, observed that the supply-limited condition could occur after a flood has removed <br />much of the transportable material from the river bed, in which case the subsequent flows would transport <br />less sediment than it could if more transportable sediment were available. In fact, one of the assumptions <br />upon which his transport relation is based is an "unlimited supply of transportable solids". In a later paper <br />(Bagnold, 1980), he observed that no general relation between stream power and sediment transport rate <br />can be expected if the availability of the sediment is limited. Where a coarse surface layer overlies a finer <br />layer of grave~ the total bed material yield for this fmer material will be less than the nominal capacity. This <br />is common in mixed sand-gravel channels where, in many floods, the sand is moved along, and removed <br />from the bed, without disturbance of the gravel layer (Carson and Griffiths, 1987). According to Carson and <br />Griffiths (1987), this is common in upland channels that have coarse beds. Finer material is shed to the <br />channel from hillslopes and moves downstream as bed material, often in waves associated with the point.. <br />source inputs. In this case, the bed material yields are often substantially less than the transporting capacity <br />of the river, being controlled by availability of the transportable material. <br /> <br />Others have observed a progressive decline in the concentration of sediment in transport during <br />extended high flow periods. For example, Beschta, et.al. (1981) noted a decrease in bedload transport over <br />time in a coarse bedded stream during a prolonged reservoir release with nearly constant discharge. They <br />concluded that the reduction was the result of limited sediment sources within the channel. Nanson (1974) <br />proposed that the decline in bed material concentration was the result of a seasonal decrease in the intensity <br />of geomorphic processes controlling sediment supply to the stream channe~ in contrast to the "generally <br />accepted belief that bedload is controlled by the hydraulic and bed characteristics of a stream." Certain <br />mountain streams are more than competent to transport the material supplied to them, but the limited <br />period over which the processes supplying significant quantities of material to the stream act "restricts the <br />supply to less than capacity." According to Muller (1955), in streams where the running bed load is much <br />fmer than the bed material, there is no connection between the bed load transport and run-off, the stream is <br />in a state of latent erosion, and the inflowing bed load runs off without scouring the coarse..textured bed. It <br />should be recognized, of course, that even in a supply-limited stream, there is some correlation between the <br />supply and the level of flow in the stream since the geomorphic processes that govern the input of material <br />to the stream are related to the runoff conditions from the watershed. <br /> <br />5-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.